IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000174/008062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diseno de estrategias óptimas para la selección de portafolios, un análisis de la ponderación inversa al riesgo (PIR)

Author

Listed:
  • Puerta Molina, Andrés Felipe
  • Laniado Rojas, Henry

Abstract

Resumen: El objetivo del artículo es determinar el comportamiento de la estrategia de selección de portafolios que asigna una ponderación a cada activo inversamente proporcional al riesgo individual del mismo (PIR) y compararla con las estrategias clásicas de mediavarianza (M-V), mínima varianza (MINVAR) y estrategia equiponderada (1/N). Para ello se realizan estimaciones out of sample y se dan condiciones bajo las cuales la PIR conduce a ponderaciones menos riesgosas que la estrategia 1/N para el mercado de valores de Colombia. Como conclusión, se encuentra evidencia del mejor desempeno de la PIR con respecto a las estrategias clásicas en términos de los indicadores de rentabilidad, riesgo, ratio de Sharpe, Turnover (costos) y Turnover (estabilidad).

Suggested Citation

  • Puerta Molina, Andrés Felipe & Laniado Rojas, Henry, 2011. "Diseno de estrategias óptimas para la selección de portafolios, un análisis de la ponderación inversa al riesgo (PIR)," Revista Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000174:008062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/lecturasdeeconomia/article/view/7873/7414
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Portafolios de inversión; títulos; rentabilidad; riesgo; Ponderación inversa al riesgo;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • R52 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Land Use and Other Regulations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000174:008062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Antioquia. Facultad de Ciencias Economicas. (Laura Maria Posada Arboleda) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciantco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.