IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v71y2018i01p03-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Missed Climate Goal for 2020: Time to Rethink Climate Policy?

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Kemfert
  • Erik Gawel
  • Manfred Fischedick
  • Marc Oliver Bettzüge
  • Felix Chr. Matthes
  • Andreas Kuhlmann

Abstract

New calculations by the Germany Federal Ministry for the Environment show that Germany will probably fall a long way short of its climate targets for 2020. How should climate policy be reformulated and which incentive systems are necessary for an effective climate policy that makes economic sense? Claudia Kemfert, German Advisory Council on the Environment and DIW, highlights the need for a quick switch in the energy and transport sectors. A fast phase-out of coal is needed to at least bring Germany closer to its emission reduction targets. Further progress also needs to be made in expanding renewable energies and a sustainable turnaround in transport needs to be initiated. To achieve this it is necessary to implement a reform and benefits with a view to raising taxes on fossil fuels and lowering those on renewable energies. Kemfert also argues in favour of introducing an admission quota for electric drives, ambitious thresholds and fiscal incentives to improve vehicle efficiency, as well as road tolls based on distance travelled. According to Erik Gawel, University of Leipzig and Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ, Leipzig, climate policy in Germany needs a structural reboot. This primarily calls for a social consensus on the need for stringent climate protection and the recovery of a climate policy consensus at the EU level. The unsatisfactory results of climate protection policy and its disparate form reflected these basic social deficits and could not be remedied with individual measures. Manfred Fischedick, Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie, believes that it is possible to return to a successful climate policy. To find suitable ways of doing so, the dialogue with key stakeholders needs to be continued and embedded in a broader social-policy discourse. Serious discussion is needed of how a path can be found leading to greenhouse gas neutrality in every sector. At an international level there should also be more alliances involving cooperation in implementation. Marc Oliver Bettzüge, University of Cologne, suggests structuring the national climate goals for 2020 according to the division stipulated by the EU of ETS and non-ETS sectors. The size of the overall target is the sum of the two sub-goals for the ETS sector on the one hand, and for the non-ETS sector on the other. A revision of Germany's climate targets that systematically differentiates between ETS and non-ETS sectors would bring the measures required to achieve them into sharper focus. While attention should primarily be focused on tax measures in the non-ETS sectors, in Germany's ETS sectors it is a question of suitable complements to the EU regulation on ETS, as well as a far-reaching reform of the payment system for electricity. Felix Chr. Matthes, Öko-Institut, Berlin, assumes that the policy priorities pursued in regulations and investment financing in recent years need to be supplemented in several areas at the very least. A first priority action item would be to take a more stringent approach to CO2 pricing. In his view, the system of explicit and implicit CO2 pricing in Germany– and in the European Union – is neither sufficiently effective or consistent. Secondly, there is the challenge of how transformation in the transport sector can be accelerated. In the short and middle term there is no way around the market introduction of electric vehicles. Andreas Kuhlmann, Deutsche Energie-Agentur (dena), writes that the present regulatory and legislative framework is far too old and rigid, over-complex and deters innovation. This is unsurprising since it is primarily based on circumstances and a target description dating from the early 2000s, when renewable energies had to be taken "out of a niche". Digitalisation was still almost unheard of at that time and the amazing cost reductions offered by various technologies were not yet apparent. Germany could cut its CO2 emissions by up to 90% through 2050, if the technologies known to us today were to be optimally used in a transformation path. This would mean consistently designing energy industry framework conditions so that climate protection technologies could prove themselves competitive in a free market. New approaches are needed to rethink climate policy. These approaches need to remain open to future developments and should not stipulate everything from the outset and obstruct entire technology paths in the process.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Kemfert & Erik Gawel & Manfred Fischedick & Marc Oliver Bettzüge & Felix Chr. Matthes & Andreas Kuhlmann, 2018. "Missed Climate Goal for 2020: Time to Rethink Climate Policy?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(01), pages 03-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:71:y:2018:i:01:p:03-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd.2018-01-kemfert-etal-klimaziele-2018-01-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Perthuis, Christian & Trotignon, Raphael, 2014. "Governance of CO2 markets: Lessons from the EU ETS," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 100-106.
    2. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13539 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Lehmann, Paul & Gawel, Erik, 2013. "Why should support schemes for renewable electricity complement the EU emissions trading scheme?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 597-607.
    4. Jarke, Johannes & Perino, Grischa, 2017. "Do renewable energy policies reduce carbon emissions? On caps and inter-industry leakage," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 102-124.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Boqiang & Jia, Zhijie, 2020. "Is emission trading scheme an opportunity for renewable energy in China? A perspective of ETS revenue redistributions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    2. Carsten Helm & Mathias Mier, 2020. "Steering the Energy Transition in a World of Intermittent Electricity Supply: Optimal Subsidies and Taxes for Renewables Storage," ifo Working Paper Series 330, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    3. Osorio, Sebastian & Pietzcker, Robert C. & Pahle, Michael & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2020. "How to deal with the risks of phasing out coal in Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Casini, Paolo & Valentini, Edilio, 2019. "Emissions Markets with Price Stabilizing Mechanisms: Possible Unpleasant Outcomes," ES: Economics for Sustainability 291801, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) > ES: Economics for Sustainability.
    5. Quemin, Simon & Trotignon, Raphaël, 2021. "Emissions trading with rolling horizons," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Anke, Carl-Philipp & Hobbie, Hannes & Schreiber, Steffi & Möst, Dominik, 2020. "Coal phase-outs and carbon prices: Interactions between EU emission trading and national carbon mitigation policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Frondel, Manuel & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Vance, Colin, 2014. ""Grüner" Strom gleich guter Strom? Warum Solarförderung ein teurer Irrtum ist," RWI Positionen 57, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
    8. Yun-Jung Lee & Neung-Woo Kim & Ki-Hong Choi & Seong-Min Yoon, 2020. "Analysis of the Informational Efficiency of the EU Carbon Emission Trading Market: Asymmetric MF-DFA Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Gawel, Erik & Lehmann, Paul & Purkus, Alexandra & Söderholm, Patrik & Witte, Katherina, 2017. "Rationales for technology-specific RES support and their relevance for German policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 16-26.
    10. Melliger, Marc, 2023. "Quantifying technology skewness in European multi-technology auctions and the effect of design elements and other driving factors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Jianfeng Guo & Bin Su & Guang Yang & Lianyong Feng & Yinpeng Liu & Fu Gu, 2018. "How Do Verified Emissions Announcements Affect the Comoves between Trading Behaviors and Carbon Prices? Evidence from EU ETS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Fischer, W. & Hake, J.-Fr. & Kuckshinrichs, W. & Schröder, T. & Venghaus, S., 2016. "German energy policy and the way to sustainability: Five controversial issues in the debate on the “Energiewende”," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1580-1591.
    13. Claudio Marcantonini, A. Denny Ellerman, 2015. "The Implicit Carbon Price of Renewable Energy Incentives in Germany," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4).
    14. Andini, Corrado & Cabral, Ricardo & Santos, José Eusébio, 2019. "The macroeconomic impact of renewable electricity power generation projects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 1047-1059.
    15. Qin Fei & Rajah Rasiah & Leow Jia Shen, 2014. "The Clean Energy-Growth Nexus with CO2 Emissions and Technological Innovation in Norway and New Zealand," Energy & Environment, , vol. 25(8), pages 1323-1344, December.
    16. Frédéric Branger & Oskar Lecuyer & Philippe Quirion, 2013. "The European Union Emissions Trading System : should we throw the flagship out with the bathwater ?," Working Papers hal-00866408, HAL.
    17. Böhringer, Christoph & Rosendahl, Knut Einar, 2022. "Europe beyond coal – An economic and climate impact assessment," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    18. Child, Michael & Kemfert, Claudia & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Breyer, Christian, 2019. "Flexible electricity generation, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 139, pages 80-101.
    19. Andrea Bigano & Aleksander Śniegocki & Jacopo Zotti, 2016. "Policies for a More Dematerialized EU Economy. Theoretical Underpinnings, Political Context and Expected Feasibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Zeng, Yingying, 2017. "Indirect double regulation and the carbon ETSs linking: The case of coal-fired generation in the EU and China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 268-280.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:71:y:2018:i:01:p:03-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.