IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v69y2016i21p03-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU’s Difficult Relation to Turkey: How Does Turkey’s Future Look?

Author

Listed:
  • Ludwig Schulz
  • Helge Tolksdorf
  • Ayşe Yüreklí
  • Erdal Yalcin
  • Galina Kolev

Abstract

Turkey is in a state of emergency, its relationship with the EU is more threatened than ever before and its hopes of joining the EU are fading fast. However, instead of focusing on how to harness Turkey’s untapped economic potential, the debate is increasingly dominated by assessments of political risks. For Ludwig Schulz, Centrum für angewandte Politikforschung (C•A•P), University of Munich, the failed coup of 15 July 2016 marks a turning point in Turkey’s political and social development. President Erdoğan and the AKP are working on a “New Turkey”, with a conservative-nationalist unit at its core under new presidential leadership. There will be no place for liberal democracy, pluralism and Europe. To date there is a lack of any convincing response from Germany and the EU. Helge Tolksdorf, German Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy, sees the Turkish economy at a crossroads. Although the economic success of Turkey in recent years is undoubtedly a success story, its economic model based on foreign credit and domestic demand can only continue to prevail if confidence in political and economic framework conditions in Turkey is restored. Ayşe Yüreklí, TÜSIAD and TCCI, argue for a critical discussion of the “Turkey question.” If European policy continues to fail with regard to Turkey, this country will indeed carry on changing in a disquieting way. Turkey’s accession to the EU would significantly increase the heterogeneity of the EU, but this would not necessarily be negative. Erdal Yalcin, Ifo Institute, discusses the negative impact of TTIP on Turkey, should the agreement be finalised. The long-term forecast loss for Turkey would total up to 2% of GDP. A key reason for this loss is institutional weaknesses in the organisation of the European customs union with Turkey. A feasible way of offsetting these differences would be to further deepen the customs union. Galina Kolev, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft Köln, points out that despite the progress made in Turkey’s economic position to date remains relatively fragile, since the Turkish economic remains characterised by fundamental imbalances. Its balance-of-payments deficit, which remains high, and the dependency on foreign capital underpinning it, represents a challenge to the country’s long-term development. To safeguard Turkey’s long-term attractiveness for international investors, the government needs to continue its reform efforts, reinforce incentives for innovation and research and restore stability and confidence in Turkey’s institutional framework conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ludwig Schulz & Helge Tolksdorf & Ayşe Yüreklí & Erdal Yalcin & Galina Kolev, 2016. "The EU’s Difficult Relation to Turkey: How Does Turkey’s Future Look?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(21), pages 03-25, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:69:y:2016:i:21:p:03-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2016-21-schulz-etal-tuerkei-eu-2016-11-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kolev, Galina V. & Niehues, Judith, 2016. "The inequality-growth relationship: An empirical reassessment," IW-Reports 7/2016, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    2. Robert J. Barro, 2015. "Convergence and Modernisation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 125(585), pages 911-942, June.
    3. Przemyslaw Kowalski & Javier Lopez Gonzalez & Alexandros Ragoussis & Cristian Ugarte, 2015. "Participation of Developing Countries in Global Value Chains: Implications for Trade and Trade-Related Policies," OECD Trade Policy Papers 179, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dazhong Cheng & Jian Wang & Zhiguo Xiao, 2022. "Free trade agreements partnership and value chain linkages: Evidence from China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 2532-2559, August.
    2. Aslihan Atabek & Dan Andrews & Rauf Gönenç, 2017. "Rebalancing Turkey’s growth by improving resource allocation and productivity in manufacturing," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1367, OECD Publishing.
    3. Wang, Ke & Yang, Kexin & Wei, Yi-Ming & Zhang, Chi, 2018. "Shadow prices of direct and overall carbon emissions in China’s construction industry: A parametric directional distance function-based sensitive estimation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 180-193.
    4. Kim, Hyungtai & Ahn, Sanghoon & Ulfarsson, Gudmundur F., 2021. "Impacts of transportation and industrial complexes on establishment-level productivity growth in Korea," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 89-97.
    5. Otto Brøns-Petersen & Søren Havn Gjedsted, 2021. "Climate change and institutional change: what is the relative importance for economic performance?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(2), pages 333-360, April.
    6. Patel, Dev & Sandefur, Justin & Subramanian, Arvind, 2021. "The new era of unconditional convergence," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    7. Baiker, Laura & Bertola, Elena & Jelitto, Markus, 2021. "Services Domestic Regulation - Locking in good regulatory practices: Analyzing the prevalence of Services Domestic Regulation disciplines and their potential linkages with economic performance," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2021-14, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    8. Vijay Kumar Kaul & Tuhina Roy Chowdhury, 2018. "India Stimulating Growth in Bay of Bengal Region: Integrating Key Interests and Strengthening Innovation Capacity," South Asian Survey, , vol. 25(1-2), pages 102-128, March.
    9. Jochimsen Beate & Raffer Christian, 2018. "Herausforderungen bei der Messung von Wohlfahrt," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 67(1), pages 63-100, May.
    10. Bentzen, Jeanet Sinding, 2021. "In crisis, we pray: Religiosity and the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 541-583.
    11. Zhang, Xiaobei & Wang, Xiaojun, 2021. "Measures of human capital and the mechanics of economic growth," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    12. Philipp Heimberger, 2022. "Does economic globalisation promote economic growth? A meta‐analysis," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 1690-1712, June.
    13. Alcalá, Francisco & Solaz, Marta, 2018. "International Relocation of Production and Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 13422, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    14. Nam Hoang Vu & Tuan Anh Bui & Tram Bao Hoang & Hanh My Pham, 2022. "Information technology adoption and integration into global value chains: Evidence from small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises in Vietnam," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 259-286, March.
    15. Joel Peress & jim goldman, 2016. "Firm Innovation and Financial Analysis: How Do They Interact?," 2016 Meeting Papers 531, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    16. Jerzmanowski, Michal & Tamura, Robert, 2019. "Directed technological change & cross-country income differences: A quantitative analysis," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Kazuhiro Kumo & Alexandra Koval & Irina Korgun & Olga Trofimenko, 2018. "Foreign Trade and Regional Inequality:The Case of the Russian Federation," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 884-895.
    18. Siranova, Maria & Tiruneh, Menbere Workie & Fisera, Boris, 2021. "Creating the illicit capital flows network in Europe – Do the net errors and omissions follow an economic pattern?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 955-973.
    19. Arnaud Deseau, 2023. "Speed of Convergence in a Malthusian World: Weak or Strong Homeostasis?," AMSE Working Papers 2326, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    20. Jan Hagemejer, 2015. "Productivity spillovers in the GVC. The case of Poland and the New EU Member States," Working Papers 2015-42, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:69:y:2016:i:21:p:03-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.