IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v64y2011i03p03-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU rescue fund: Does it mark the beginning of a transfer union?

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Schäuble
  • Jürgen Stark
  • Clemens Fuest
  • Christian Fahrholz
  • Michael Eilfort
  • Verena Mertins

Abstract

Does the euro rescue fund, which was created last year, violate fundamental principles of the Maastricht Treaty? Is the EU about to establish a transfer union? Wolfgang Schäuble, German Federal Minister of Finance, presents the position of the federal government, namely that the creation of the European Financial Stability Fund (EFSF) and current work on establishing a permanent European Stabilisation Mechanism (ESM) is in no way the beginning of a transfer union. It was clear to the federal government from the very beginning that the EFSF can only be an interim solution. This is why the government favours a concept of a permanent ESM for the eurozone, which is meant to supplement the stricter measures of fiscal- and economic-policy monitoring within the framework of the Stability and Growth Pact in order to safeguard the long-term financial stability of the eurozone. The government's concept consists of three components: an economic and fiscal-policy adjustment programme, appropriate contributions of private creditors as well as an inter-governmental financing instrument. Jürgen Stark, member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank stresses that the existing contractual foundations of the monetary union, particularly the no-bailout clause and the prohibition of financial transfers, must not be circumvented by the new mechanism. Otherwise there is the danger of a weakening of the stability-pact basis of the euro with unforeseeable economic and political results. Clemens Fuest, Oxford University, outlines a strategy for overcoming the crisis. This strategy focuses on debt restructuring, but also temporarily integrates elements of community responsibility in cases of insolvency until the current sovereign debt crisis is resolved. For Christian Fahrholz, University of Jena, aspects of an implicit transfer union with quasi joint and several liability are already visible today. Michael Eilfort and Verena Mertins of the Market Economy Foundation (Stiftung Marktwirtschaft), Berlin, reject the institutionalisation of the rescue fund. They question whether the desirable stabilisation of the euro entails that a blank check be granted in fact to every member of the eurozone. In the end a community of debtors and a transfer union does not mean more solidarity but simply more false incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Schäuble & Jürgen Stark & Clemens Fuest & Christian Fahrholz & Michael Eilfort & Verena Mertins, 2011. "EU rescue fund: Does it mark the beginning of a transfer union?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(03), pages 03-20, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:64:y:2011:i:03:p:03-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2011_3_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Fahrholz & Cezary Wójcik, 2010. "The Bail-Out! Positive Political Economics of Greek-type Crises in the EMU," CESifo Working Paper Series 3178, CESifo.
    2. Konrad, Kai A. & Belke, Ansgar & Paulus, Christoph G. & Horn, Norbert & Deubner, Christian, 2010. "Wege aus der europäischen Staatsschuldenkrise," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 90(12), pages 783-804.
    3. Christian Fahrholz & Cezary Wójcik, 2012. "The Bail-Out! Positive Political Economics Of Greek-Type Crises In The Emu," Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy (JICEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 3(02), pages 1-18.
    4. Fuest, Clemens, 1993. "Stabile fiskalpolitische Institutionen für die Europäische Währungsunion," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 73(10), pages 539-545.
    5. Hans-Wener Sinn & Teresa Buchen & Timo Wollmershauser, 2011. "Trade Imbalances: Causes, Consequences, and Policy Measures," Book Chapters, in: Jack T. Boorman & André Icard (ed.), Reform of the International Monetary System: The Palais Royal Initiative, edition 1, chapter 26, pages 321-342, Emerging Markets Forum.
    6. Christian Fahrholz & Cezary Wójcik, 2011. "A Positive Framework to Analyze Sovereign Bail-outs within the EMU," Global Financial Markets Working Paper Series 15-2011, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    7. Hans-Werner Sinn & Kai Carstensen, 2010. "Ein Krisenmechanismus für die Eurozone," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 63, pages 01-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ebert, Werner & Eckardt, Martina, 2011. "Wirtschafts- und finanzpolitische Koordinierung in der EU – Erfahrungen aus einem Jahrzehnt Politikkoordinierung [Public policy coordination in the EU - experiences from one decade of policy coordi," MPRA Paper 29281, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Projektgruppe Gemeinschaftsdiagnose, 2011. "Joint Economic Forecast Spring 2011: Upswing continues - European Debt Crisis still Unresolved," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(08), pages 03-63, April.
    2. Christian Fahrholz & Andreas Freytag, 2011. "More market elements as one solution for the European balance of payments crisis?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 64(16), pages 73-78, September.
    3. Elsayyad, May & Konrad, Kai A., 2012. "Fighting multiple tax havens," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 295-305.
    4. Christian Fahrholz & Andreas Freytag, 2012. "A Way to Solve the Euro pean Balance of Payments Crisis? Take a Chance on Market Solutions!," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 13(1), pages 77-82, February.
    5. Fahrholz, Christian & Wójcik, Cezary, 2013. "The Eurozone needs exit rules," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4665-4674.
    6. Giancarlo Corsetti & Michael P. Devereux & John Hassler & Gilles Saint-Paul & Hans-Werner Sinn & Jan-Egbert Sturm & Xavier Vives, 2011. "Chapter 2: A New Crisis Mechanism for the Euro Area," EEAG Report on the European Economy, CESifo, vol. 0, pages 71-96, February.
    7. Christian Fahrholz & Andreas Freytag, 2012. "A Way to Solve the Euro pean Balance of Payments Crisis? Take a Chance on Market Solutions!," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 13(SPECIALIS), pages 77-82, February.
    8. Dirk Meyer & Rolf Hasse, 2009. "Threatened insolvency of a euro area country: What should the EU do?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 62(07), pages 03-10, April.
    9. Caporale, Guglielmo Maria & De Santis, Roberta & Girardi, Alessandro, 2015. "Trade intensity and output synchronisation: On the endogeneity properties of EMU," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 16(C), pages 154-163.
    10. Philip Turner, 2013. "Caveat creditor," BIS Working Papers 419, Bank for International Settlements.
    11. Juan Marchetti & Michele Ruta & Robert Teh, 2012. "Trade Imbalances and Multilateral Trade Cooperation," CESifo Working Paper Series 4050, CESifo.
    12. Hans-Werner Sinn & Timo Wollmershäuser, 2012. "Target loans, current account balances and capital flows: the ECB’s rescue facility," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 19(4), pages 468-508, August.
    13. Malte Krueger, 2013. "Sezession: Ein gefaehrliches Spiel," ROME Working Papers 201302, ROME Network.
    14. Michael Hüther & Christoph Paulus & Kathrin Berensmann, 2010. "Does Europe need an insolvency procedure for states?ta>," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 63(23), pages 3-15, December.
    15. Jochen Andritzky & Désirée I. Christofzik & Lars P. Feld & Uwe Scheuering, 2019. "A mechanism to regulate sovereign debt restructuring in the euro area," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 20-34, May.
    16. Hans-Werner Sinn & Teresa Buchen & Timo Wollmershäuser, 2011. "Trade Imbalances – Causes, Consequences and Policy Measures: Ifo’s Statement for the Camdessus Commission," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 12(1), pages 47-58, March.
    17. Benjamin Born & Teresa Buchen & Kai Carstensen & Christian Grimme & Michael Kleemann & Klaus Wohlrabe & Timo Wollmershäuser, 2012. "Withdrawal of Greece from the European Monetary Union: Historical experience, macroeconomic consequences and organisational implementation," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 65(10), pages 09-37, May.
    18. Torój, Andrzej & Bednarek, Elżbieta & Bęza-Bojanowska, Joanna & Osińska, Joanna & Waćko, Katarzyna & Witkowski, Dariusz, 2012. "EMU: the (post-)crisis perspective. Literature survey and implications for the euro-candidates," MF Working Papers 12, Ministry of Finance in Poland, revised 06 Mar 2012.
    19. Roberta De Santis & Tatiana Cesaroni, 2016. "Current Account ‘Core–Periphery Dualism’ in the EMU," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(10), pages 1514-1538, October.
    20. Clemens Fuest & Andreas Peichl, 2012. "European Fiscal Union: What Is It? Does It work? And Are There Really 'No Alternatives'?," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 13(1), pages 03-09, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:64:y:2011:i:03:p:03-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.