IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/eeagre/vy2019ip07-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Executive Summary

Author

Listed:
  • Torben M. Andersen
  • Giuseppe Bertola
  • John Driffill
  • Clemens Fuest
  • Harold James
  • Jan-Egbert Sturm
  • Branko Uroševic

Abstract

The first chapter of this year’s report reviews the politico- economic conditions and outlook, which is unusually uncertain in Europe at the moment. In 2019, the United Kingdom looks on its way to crashing out of the European Union, while the other large member countries (France, Germany, and Italy) are all experiencing serious politico-economic problems, and the European Parliament election campaign will feature strong nationalist and populist voices. Fragmentation and a tendency towards disintegration are also emerging within member countries. Europe is becoming increasingly similar to the late Habsburg Empire: a powerful example of problems arising in multinational, multi-linguistic and multi-ethnic integrated economic entities. To understand why and what the implications may be, the other three chapters of this year’s EEAG report look inside countries, where a great deal has been happening in addition to European integration, and outside Europe, where powerful economic and geopolitical challenges have shaken specific European countries and sectors. One chapter discusses the role of technological and trade developments in shaping country performance within Europe, and studies how, in specific cases, policy reactions and reforms have or have not dealt adequately with the resulting challenges. The next chapter shifts the focus from national policies to the European level, highlighting how international finance could help EU member countries face shocks and a rapidly changing global environment, and how some countries may instead try and break out of what they perceive to be unfair constraints in an incomplete European integration framework. The final chapter considers a fast-changing global environment’s implications for the European Union, focusing in particular on whether and how policymakers should deal with China’s emergence as a leading power in science and technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Torben M. Andersen & Giuseppe Bertola & John Driffill & Clemens Fuest & Harold James & Jan-Egbert Sturm & Branko Uroševic, 2019. "Executive Summary," EEAG Report on the European Economy, CESifo, vol. 0, pages 07-09, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:eeagre:v::y:2019:i::p:07-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/EEAG-2019-executive-summary.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:eeagre:v::y:2019:i::p:07-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.