IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cem/jaecon/v15y2012n2p353-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Precautionary wealth and income uncertainty: a household-level analysis

Author

Abstract

This study investigates the presence of precautionary savings among self-employed farm households using an instrumental variable approach on farm-level data. Results indicate that precautionary saving is a powerful determinant of wealth accumulation among U.S. farm households. Precautionary savings account for 53% of total wealth accumulation in general. Our results indicate an age-wealth profile that is consistent with the life-cycle hypothesis. The share of precautionary saving in total wealth accumulation differs across farm households. Results show that for farm households receiving government payments (designed to benefit farmers by reducing income variability), precautionary saving account for a large share (51%) of wealth accumulation, compared to 41% for households that do not receive any government payments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashok K. Mishra & Hiroki Uematsu & Rebekah R. Powell, 2012. "Precautionary wealth and income uncertainty: a household-level analysis," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 15, pages 353-369, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cem:jaecon:v:15:y:2012:n:2:p:353-369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ucema.edu.ar/publicaciones/download/volume15/mishra.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bande, Roberto & Riveiro, Dolores & Ruiz, Freddy, 2021. "Does Uncertainty Affect Saving Decisions of Colombian Households? Evidence on Precautionary Saving," MPRA Paper 106771, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Rabitsch, Katrin & Schoder, Christian, 2016. "Buffer stock savings in a New-Keynesian business cycle model," FinMaP-Working Papers 64, Collaborative EU Project FinMaP - Financial Distortions and Macroeconomic Performance: Expectations, Constraints and Interaction of Agents.
    3. Khanal, Aditya & Mishra, Ashok, 2016. "Income Risk, Habit Formation, and Precautionary Savings: The Case of Rural Households," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235597, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Xu, Yilan & Yilmazer, Tansel, 2021. "Childhood socioeconomic status, adulthood obesity and health: The role of parental permanent and transitory income," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Dimitris Anastasiou & Panayotis Kapopoulos & Kalliopi-Maria Zekente, 2023. "Sentimental Shocks and House Prices," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 627-655, November.
    6. Aeggarchat Sirisankanan, 2023. "Natural circumstances and farm labor supply adjustment: the response of the farm labor supply to permanent and transitory natural events," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(9), pages 9935-9961, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Income uncertainty; permanent income; precautionary savings; life-cycle; and instrumental variables; government program.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cem:jaecon:v:15:y:2012:n:2:p:353-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valeria Dowding (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cemaaar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.