IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cdh/commen/384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking Pharmacare in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Morgan

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Jamie R. Daw

    (University of British Columbia)

  • Michael R. Law

    (University of British Columbia)

Abstract

All developed countries with universal healthcare systems provide universal coverage for prescription drugs – except Canada. Instead, Canadian provinces allocate limited public subsidies for prescriptions drugs, leaving the majority of costs to be financed out-of-pocket and through private insurance. We review three of the main approaches to provincial pharmacare policy – exemplified by British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec – and compare them with policies in other countries. We find that Canadian models for prescription drug financing have major shortcomings. All provincial systems involve considerable patient charges and multiple payers that are not responsible for financing patients’ medical and hospital care. The costs borne by patients are known to reduce the use of medicines that might otherwise improve patient health and reduce costs elsewhere in the healthcare system. And the involvement of multiple payers adds administrative costs, diminishes purchasing power and creates funding silos that limit the potential for healthcare managers and providers to consider the full benefits and opportunity costs of prescription drugs as an input into the broader healthcare system. The performance of countries with comparable healthcare systems shows that integrating pharmaceuticals into the healthcare system by covering medically necessary prescription drugs at little or no cost to patients would result in improved performance on all key pharmacare policy goals. Countries with such coverage achieve better access to medicines, and greater financial protection for the ill, at significantly lower total cost than any Canadian province achieves. In this Commentary, we suggest that provinces expand public pharmacare programs to all segments of the population with a specific focus on promoting access to medicines of proven value-for-money in our healthcare system. Though the immediate effect of this would be an increase in government spending, this would, over time, be more than offset by savings to patients, employers and individuals who purchase stand-alone private drug coverage.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Morgan & Jamie R. Daw & Michael R. Law, 2013. "Rethinking Pharmacare in Canada," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 384, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cdhowe.org/rethinking-pharmacare-canada
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Delnoij, Diana & Brenner, Gerhard, 2000. "Importing budget systems from other countries: what can we learn from the German drug budget and the British GP fundholding?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 157-169, July.
    2. Hanley, Gillian E. & Morgan, Steve, 2009. "Chronic catastrophes: Exploring the concentration and sustained nature of ambulatory prescription drug expenditures in the population of British Columbia, Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 919-924, March.
    3. Blais, Lucie & Couture, Julie & Rahme, Elham & LeLorier, Jacques, 2003. "Impact of a cost sharing drug insurance plan on drug utilization among individuals receiving social assistance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 163-172, May.
    4. Andreas Seiter, 2010. "A Practical Approach to Pharmaceutical Policy," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2468, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Åke Blomqvist & Colin Busby, 2016. "The Naylor Report and Health Policy: Canada Needs a New Model," e-briefs 240, C.D. Howe Institute.
    2. Colin Busby & Jonathan Pedde, 2014. "Should Public Drug Plans be Based on Age or Income?," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 417, November.
    3. Goldsmith, Laurie J. & Kolhatkar, Ashra & Popowich, Dominic & Holbrook, Anne M. & Morgan, Steven G. & Law, Michael R., 2017. "Understanding the patient experience of cost-related non-adherence to prescription medications through typology development and application," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 51-59.
    4. Ake Blomqvist & Frances Woolley, 2018. "Filling the Cavities: Improving the Efficiency and Equity of Canada’s Dental Care System," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 510, May.
    5. Colin Busby & Ramya Muthukaran & Aaron Jacobs, 2018. "Reality Bites: How Canada’s Healthcare System Compares to its International Peers," e-briefs 271, C.D. Howe Institute.
    6. Wang, Chao & Li, Qing & Sweetman, Arthur & Hurley, Jeremiah, 2015. "Mandatory universal drug plan, access to health care and health: Evidence from Canada," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 80-96.
    7. Antonipillai, Valentina & Guindon, G. Emmanuel & Sweetman, Arthur & Baumann, Andrea & Wahoush, Olive & Schwartz, Lisa, 2021. "Associations of health services utilization by prescription drug coverage and immigration category in Ontario, Canada," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(10), pages 1311-1321.
    8. O’Brady, Sean & Gagnon, Marc-André & Cassels, Alan, 2015. "Reforming private drug coverage in Canada: Inefficient drug benefit design and the barriers to change in unionized settings," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 224-231.
    9. Ake Blomqvist & Colin Busby, 2015. "Rethinking Canada’s Unbalanced Mix of Public and Private Healthcare: Insights from Abroad," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 420, February.
    10. Daniel Schwanen, 2013. "Uneasy Birth: What Canadians Should Expect from a Canada-EU Trade Deal," e-briefs 163, C.D. Howe Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhardwaj, Ramesh, 2015. "Restraining High and Rising Cancer Drug Prices: Need for Accelerating R&D Productivity and Aligning Prices with Value," MPRA Paper 63405, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Ruof, Jorg & Mittendorf, Thomas & Pirk, Olaf & Graf von der Schulenburg, J. -Matthias, 2002. "Diffusion of innovations: treatment of Alzheimer's disease in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 59-66, April.
    3. Paraponaris, A. & Verger, P. & Desquins, B. & Villani, P. & Bouvenot, G. & Rochaix, L. & Gourheux, J. C. & Moatti, J. P. AU -, 2004. "Delivering generics without regulatory incentives?: Empirical evidence from French general practitioners about willingness to prescribe international non-proprietary names," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 23-32, October.
    4. Bergstrom, Gina & Karlberg, Ingvar, 2007. "Decentralized responsibility for costs of outpatient prescription pharmaceuticals in Sweden: Assessment of models for decentralized financing of subsidies from a management perspective," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(2-3), pages 358-367, May.
    5. Non, Mariëlle & van Kleef, Richard & van der Galiën, Onno & Douven, Rudy, 2019. "The effect of reinsuring a deductible on pharmaceutical spending: A Dutch case study on low-income people," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(10), pages 976-981.
    6. Riise, Julie & Hole, Arne Risa & Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte & Skåtun, Diane, 2016. "GPs' implicit prioritization through clinical choices – evidence from three national health services," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 169-183.
    7. Kwon, Hye-Young & Hong, Ji-Min & Godman, Brian & Yang, Bong-Min, 2013. "Price cuts and drug spending in South Korea: The case of antihyperlipidemic agents," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(3), pages 217-226.
    8. World Bank, 2017. "Georgia Public Expenditure Review," World Bank Publications - Reports 27138, The World Bank Group.
    9. Kim Olsen & Dorte Gyrd-Hansen & Andreas Boegh & Sofie Hansen, 2009. "GPs as citizens’ agents: prescription behavior and altruism," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 10(4), pages 399-407, October.
    10. Mario Martínez-Jiménez & Pilar García-Gómez & Jaume Puig-Junoy, 2021. "The Effect of Changes in Cost Sharing on the Consumption of Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medicines in Catalonia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    11. Afschin Gandjour, 2013. "Reference Pricing and Price Negotiations for Innovative New Drugs," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 11-14, January.
    12. Samuel Yaw Akomea & Olav Jull Sørensen & Kweku Amponsah-Efah, 2014. "Export Drivers And Barriers: Evidence From Ghanaian Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Firms," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 8(2), pages 81-96.
    13. Srivastava, Divya & McGuire, Alistair, 2013. "Analysis of prices paid by low-income countries - how price sensitive is government demand for medicines?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 54487, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Park, Sun-Young & Han, Euna & Kim, Jini & Lee, Eui-Kyung, 2016. "Factors influencing the difference between forecasted and actual drug sales volumes under the price–volume agreement in South Korea," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(8), pages 867-874.
    15. Yue-Chune Lee & Ming-Chin Yang & Yu-Tung Huang & Chien-Hsiang Liu & Sun-Bing Chen, 2006. "Impacts of Cost Containment Strategies on Pharmaceutical Expenditures of the National Health Insurance in Taiwan, 1996–2003," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 891-902, September.
    16. Iván Moreno-Torres & Jaume Puig-Junoy & Josep Raya, 2011. "The impact of repeated cost containment policies on pharmaceutical expenditure: experience in Spain," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(6), pages 563-573, December.
    17. Soppi, Aarni & Heino, Pekka & Kurko, Terhi & Maljanen, Timo & Saastamoinen, Leena & Aaltonen, Katri, 2018. "Growth of diabetes drug expenditure decomposed—A nationwide analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(12), pages 1326-1332.
    18. Non, Mariëlle & van Kleef, Richard & van der Galiën, Onno & Douven, Rudy, 2019. "The effect of reinsuring a deductible on pharmaceutical spending: A Dutch case study on low-income people," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(10), pages 976-981.
    19. Srivastava, Divya & McGuire, Alistair, 2015. "Patient access to health care and medicines across low-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 21-27.
    20. Bonny Parkinson & Catherine Sermet & Fiona Clement & Steffan Crausaz & Brian Godman & Sarah Garner & Moni Choudhury & Sallie-Anne Pearson & Rosalie Viney & Ruth Lopert & Adam Elshaug, 2015. "Disinvestment and Value-Based Purchasing Strategies for Pharmaceuticals: An International Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 33(9), pages 905-924, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social Policy; Health Policy; public health coverage;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kristine Gray (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdhowca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.