Which reforms for a fair and sustainable pension system?
AbstractIn the absence of reform, the cost of pension is set to become unsustainable for our social security system. Two types of potential structural reforms are often considered: the move towards a fully funded system, or towards a system of notional accounts. In this paper, we review the strengths and weaknesses of the three regimes. The current, pay-as-you-go (PAYG), system allows better redistribution but tends to produce structural deficits. Funded systems are actuarially fair and boost national savings, but are subject to the same risks as financial markets. The solution thus seems set to be found in notional accounts. That system is similar to the PAYG system in remaining public and unfunded, but the pension benefit is more closely tied to the contribution made during ones? working life. We however argue that such a reform must be led together with a reduction in inequalities in the labour market, to ensure that unemployment spells do not hit particular fringes of the population, while others are sheltered. In particular, early spells of unemployment can prove very costly for one?s eventual pension benefits.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique.
Volume (Year): L (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.cairn.info/revue-reflets-et-perspectives-de-la-vie-economique.htm
Other versions of this item:
- Micael Castanheira De Moura & Vincenzo Galasso, 2011. "Which reforms for a fair and sustainable pension system?," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/136803, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.