Patents' novelty requirement and endogenous growth
AbstractIn this paper, I develop and endogenous quality ladders growth model, in which the patent Office imposes a novelty requirement for innovations. The size of innovations realized by firms are heterogeneous and drawn from a probability distribution. They determine the price setting behaviour of firms: limit pricing strategy if innovation is non-drastic, or monopoly pricing without constraint if it is a drastic one. Both monopoly configurations are possible for a sector, depending on the size of the innovation in vigour. The aggregation of all the industries in the economy enables to exhibit the proportion of sectors in each case and the strength of competitive pressure in the economy. The patent?s novelty requirement has an effect both on the average height of innovations and the economy?s market structure of the economy. Patent height stands to be an instrument for regulating innovation and growth. We explore its effects on welfare and ressources allocation to research activity and discuss its implications for competition and market structure.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Dalloz in its journal Revue d'économie politique.
Volume (Year): Volume 114 (2004)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique.htm
quality ladders; patent height; novelty requirement; innovation; growth;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Aghion, Philippe & Harris, Christopher & Vickers, John, 1997. "Competition and growth with step-by-step innovation: An example," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-5), pages 771-782, April.
- Chu, Angus C. & Cozzi, Guido & Galli, Silvia, 2010.
"Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation?,"
29061, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Chu, Angus C. & Cozzi, Guido & Galli, Silvia, 2012. "Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 727-746.
- Chu, Angus C. & Cozzi, Guido & Galli, Silvia, 2010. "Does intellectual monopoly stimulate or stifle innovation?," MPRA Paper 31019, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised May 2011.
- Jacobo Campo Robledo, 2012.
"Impacto De Las Patentes Sobre El Crecimiento Económico: Un Modelo Panel Cointegrado [Impact of Patents on Economic Growth: A Cointegrated Panel Data Model],"
- Jacobo Campo Robledo, 2012. "Impacto de las Patentes sobre el crecimiento económico: Un modelo panel cointegrado," ESTUDIOS ECONÃMICOS SIC 010091, SUPERINTENDENCIA DE INDUSTRIA Y COMERCIO.
- Cysne, Rubens P. & Turchick, David, 2012. "Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth revisited," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 851-861.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.