Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Dissuasion de la collusion et efficacité de deux systèmes d'amendes


Author Info

  • Saïd Souam


[eng] Collusion deterrence and efficiency of two regimes of fines. . Within a Principal Agent Model, we characterize the optimal policy of an agency in charge of competition policy. We consider a situation of asymmetric information concerning the cost of production between the agency and the industry to be controlled. Moreover, we consider two regimes of fines used in practice. The first one makes the fine a fixed proportion of the total sales. The second one makes the fine a multiple of the industry profit from colluding. We compare the two regimes in terms of deterrence levels and efficiency. [fre] Dissuasion de la collusion et efficacité de deux systèmes d'amendes. . Dans le cadre d'un modèle Principal-Agent, nous caractérisons la politique optimale des autorités de la concurrence (Principal) faisant face à une industrie (Agent). Pour cela, nous considérons une situation d'information asymétrique où les autorités ne disposent que d'un a priori sur les coûts de production de l'indus­trie. De plus, nous considérons deux systèmes d'amendes utilisés en pratique. Dans le premier système, l'amende est égale à un pourcentage donné du chiffre d'affaires. Dans le second, l'amende est égale à un multiple du profit engendré par la collusion. Nous comparons les deux systèmes en termes de niveaux de dissuasion et d'efficacité.

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL:
Download Restriction: free

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Presses de Sciences-Po in its journal Revue économique.

Volume (Year): n° 49 (1998)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 755-765

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_p1998_49n3_0755

Contact details of provider:
Web page:

Related research


Other versions of this item:


No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.


Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Gianmaria Martini & Cinzia Rovesti, 2004. "Antitrust policy and price collusion. Public agencies vs delegation," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 70(2), pages 127-151.
  2. Gilles Rotillon & Philippe Bontems, 2000. "Honnêteté et conformité environnementale," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 143(2), pages 117-127.


This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


Access and download statistics


When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_p1998_49n3_0755. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.