Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

La rénovation des fondements de l'utilité et du risque

Contents:

Author Info

  • Marc Willinger

Abstract

[eng] New foundations of uitlity and risk theory . . Expected utility theory is grounded on two questionable hypothesis which follow from the independence axion : 1) the weights of utilities are probabilities and 2) utilities of consequences are independent on their probabilities. Empirical refutations of the independence axiom entailed an examination of those hypothesis and a broadening of the definition of rationality in uncertain situations. It is now recognized that irrational behaviors with respect to expected utility theory might be considered as fully rational if we relax hypothesis 1 and 2. We present a critical survey of new theories of behavior under uncertainty, showing how they solve well-know paradoxes of expected utility theory and pointing out their limits. Our presentation insists on an important aspect for defining choice criteria under uncertainty, neglected until now, the modelling of beliefs. [fre] La rénovation des fondements de l'utilité et du risque. . La théorie de l'utilité espérée est fondée sur deux hypothèses restrictives qui découlent de l'axiome d'indépendance : 1) les pondérations des utilités sont des probabilités et 2) les utilités des conséquences ne dépendent pas de leurs probabilités. Les contradictions empiriques de l'axiome d'indépendance ont amené à une révision de ces hypothèses et à élargir le champ de la relationalité en incertain. Il est maintenant admis que des comportements qui sont jugés irrationnels du point de vue du critère de l'utilité espérée sont tout à fait rationnels lorsqu'on lève les hypothèses restrictives 1 et 2 ci-dessus. Nous proposons dans cet article une revue critique de ces nouvelles théories en montrant comment elles permettent d'assimiler certains paradoxes célèbres de la théorie de l'utilité espérée (A/lais, Ellsberg, etc.) et en mettant en évidence leurs limites. Notre présentation met en avant l'importance de la modélisation des croyances, négligée jusqu

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RECO_P1990_41N1_0005
Download Restriction: free

File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-economique-1990-1-page-5.htm
Download Restriction: free

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Presses de Sciences-Po in its journal Revue économique.

Volume (Year): n° 41 (1990)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 5-48

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_p1990_41n1_0005

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.cairn.info/revue-economique.htm

Related research

Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Meglena Jeleva, 2005. "Croyances de survie et choix de contrat d'assurance décès une étude empirique," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 71(1), pages 95-116.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_p1990_41n1_0005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.