IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bus/jphile/v5y2011i1p168-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review essay on David Laibman, Deep History: A Study in Social Evolution and Human Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Altug Yalcintas

    (Monash University)

Abstract

While historical materialism and evolutionism provide similar explanations and ideas regarding the cause of long-term social change, the two theories are rarely used in conjunction with one another. In Deep History, the author David Laibman addresses some of the standard questions of evolutionary social theory and attempts to bridge the two concepts, by showing that historical and materialist explanations are present in both Marxian and evolutionary interpretations of history. His goal: develop a Marxist theory of history from an evolutionist perspective, and surmount the traditional confines of historical materialism, so as to embrace evolutionary conceptions in explaining social change. However, the unbalanced research methodology limits the reach and depth of Laibman’s contribution. The two main shortcomings of his work are discussed in the following sections: The Audience Problem and The Evolutionary Problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Altug Yalcintas, 2011. "Review essay on David Laibman, Deep History: A Study in Social Evolution and Human Potential," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 168-182, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bus:jphile:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:168-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpe.ro/pdf.php?id=2907
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://jpe.ro/?id=revista&p=143
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Directionality; (un-)intentionality; contingency; path dependency; evolutionary political economy; evolutionary historical materialism; critical realism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Y30 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Book Reviews - - - Book Reviews

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bus:jphile:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:168-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Cojanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.