IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/strimo/v27y2009i1p1-23n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust efficient hedging for American options: The existence of worst case probability measures

Author

Listed:
  • Trevino Aguilar Erick

Abstract

Our problem here starts when the seller of an American option H has an initial capital c and aims to control shortfall risk by optimally trading in the market. We consider the case where the initial capital c is smaller than the superhedging cost of H. Thus, it is meaningful to consider efficient strategies of partial hedging. We investigate in the American case the approach of Föllmer and Leukert of efficiently hedging European options. At the same time, we consider situations where the model R is ambiguous. This implies that the seller´s preference is going to be represented by a robust loss functional, involving a whole class of absolutely continuous probability measures Q. We apply a construction due to Föllmer and Kramkov on the existence of Fatou-convergent sequences of convex combinations of supermartingales, to show that optimal strategies minimizing such a functional exist. We then show that the robust efficient hedging problem can be reduced into a non-robust problem of efficient hedging with respect to a worst case probability measure Q*∈Q, if Q satisfies a compactness condition and H is essentially bounded.

Suggested Citation

  • Trevino Aguilar Erick, 2009. "Robust efficient hedging for American options: The existence of worst case probability measures," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 27(1), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:strimo:v:27:y:2009:i:1:p:1-23:n:1
    DOI: 10.1524/stnd.2009.1005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1524/stnd.2009.1005
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1524/stnd.2009.1005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Yu & X. Z. Yuan, 1998. "New Saddle Point Theorem Beyond Topological Vector Spaces," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 211-219, January.
    2. Alexander Schied, 2005. "Optimal Investments for Robust Utility Functionals in Complete Market Models," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 750-764, August.
    3. Alexander Schied & Ching-Tang Wu, 2005. "Duality theory for optimal investments under model uncertainty," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2005-025, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany, revised Sep 2005.
    4. Thomas Goll & Ludger Rüschendorf, 2001. "Minimax and minimal distance martingale measures and their relationship to portfolio optimization," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 557-581.
    5. Gilboa, Itzhak & Schmeidler, David, 1989. "Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 141-153, April.
    6. Hans FÃllmer & Peter Leukert, 2000. "Efficient hedging: Cost versus shortfall risk," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 117-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gundel, Anne & Weber, Stefan, 2008. "Utility maximization under a shortfall risk constraint," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(11), pages 1126-1151, December.
    2. Sigrid Källblad, 2017. "Risk- and ambiguity-averse portfolio optimization with quasiconcave utility functionals," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 397-425, April.
    3. Alexander Schied, 2005. "Optimal Investments for Risk- and Ambiguity-Averse Preferences: A Duality Approach," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2005-051, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany, revised Aug 2006.
    4. Alexander Schied, 2008. "Robust optimal control for a consumption-investment problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 67(1), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Hernández-Hernández Daniel & Schied Alexander, 2006. "Robust utility maximization in a stochastic factor model," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 24(1/2006), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Alexander Schied & Ching-Tang Wu, 2005. "Duality theory for optimal investments under model uncertainty," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2005-025, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany, revised Sep 2005.
    7. Sigrid Källblad & Jan Obłój & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2018. "Dynamically consistent investment under model uncertainty: the robust forward criteria," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 879-918, October.
    8. Schied Alexander & Wu Ching-Tang, 2005. "Duality theory for optimal investments under model uncertainty," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 23(3/2005), pages 199-217, March.
    9. Hernández-Hernández, Daniel & Schied, Alexander, 2007. "A control approach to robust utility maximization with logarithmic utility and time-consistent penalties," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 117(8), pages 980-1000, August.
    10. Schumacher Johannes M., 2018. "Distortion risk measures, ROC curves, and distortion divergence," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 35(1-2), pages 35-50, January.
    11. Qian Lin & Frank Riedel, 2021. "Optimal consumption and portfolio choice with ambiguous interest rates and volatility," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(3), pages 1189-1202, April.
    12. Jorn Sass & Dorothee Westphal, 2019. "Robust Utility Maximizing Strategies under Model Uncertainty and their Convergence," Papers 1909.01830, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    13. Thomas Knispel, 2012. "Asymptotics of robust utility maximization," Papers 1203.1191, arXiv.org.
    14. Kardaras, Constantinos & Robertson, Scott, 2012. "Robust maximization of asymptotic growth," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 44994, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Hans Follmer & Alexander Schied, 2013. "Probabilistic aspects of finance," Papers 1309.7759, arXiv.org.
    16. Guohui Guan & Zongxia Liang & Yilun Song, 2022. "The continuous-time pre-commitment KMM problem in incomplete markets," Papers 2210.13833, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    17. Gonçalo Faria & João Correia-da-Silva, 2014. "A closed-form solution for options with ambiguity about stochastic volatility," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 125-159, July.
    18. David Criens & Lars Niemann, 2022. "Robust utility maximization with nonlinear continuous semimartingales," Papers 2206.14015, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    19. Daniel Hernández-Hernández & Alexander Schied, 2007. "Robust Maximization of Consumption with Logarithmic Utility," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2007-030, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    20. Keita Owari, 2011. "On Admissible Strategies in Robust Utility Maximization," Papers 1109.5512, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2012.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:strimo:v:27:y:2009:i:1:p:1-23:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.