Estimating Stochastic Volatility Models: A Comparison of Two Importance Samplers
AbstractIn this paper, we describe and compare two simulated Maximum Likelihood estimation methods for a basic stochastic volatility model. For both methods, the likelihood function is estimated using importance sampling techniques. Based on a Monte Carlo study, we assess which method is more effective. Further, we validate the two methods using diagnostic importance sampling test procedures. Stochastic volatility models with Gaussian and Student-t distributed disturbances are considered.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by De Gruyter in its journal Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics.
Volume (Year): 8 (2004)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.degruyter.com
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Liesenfeld, Roman & Richard, Jean-François, 2004.
"Classical and Bayesian Analysis of Univariate and Multivariate Stochastic Volatility Models,"
Economics Working Papers
2004,12, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.
- Roman Liesenfeld & Jean-Francois Richard, 2006. "Classical and Bayesian Analysis of Univariate and Multivariate Stochastic Volatility Models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2-3), pages 335-360.
- Jean-Francois Richard & Roman Liesenfeld, 2007. "Classical and Bayesian Analysis of Univariate and Multivariate Stochastic Volatility Models," Working Papers 322, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2004.
- Tsyplakov, Alexander, 2010. "Revealing the arcane: an introduction to the art of stochastic volatility models," MPRA Paper 25511, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Richard, Jean-Francois & Zhang, Wei, 2007.
"Efficient high-dimensional importance sampling,"
Journal of Econometrics,
Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 1385-1411, December.
- Hans J. Skaug & Jun Yu, 2009.
"Automated Likelihood Based Inference for Stochastic Volatility Models,"
15-2009, Singapore Management University, School of Economics.
- Jun Yu, 2007. "Automated Likelihood Based Inference for Stochastic Volatility Models," Working Papers 01-2007, Sim Kee Boon Institute for Financial Economics.
- Hans J. Skaug & Jun Yu, 2007. "Automated Likelihood Based Inference for Stochastic Volatility Models," Working Papers CoFie-01-2007, Sim Kee Boon Institute for Financial Economics.
- Jung, Robert C. & Kukuk, Martin & Liesenfeld, Roman, 2006. "Time series of count data: modeling, estimation and diagnostics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(4), pages 2350-2364, December.
- Pastorello, S. & Rossi, E., 2010. "Efficient importance sampling maximum likelihood estimation of stochastic differential equations," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 2753-2762, November.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.