IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sagmbi/v11y2011i1n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alignment-free Sequence Comparison for Biologically Realistic Sequences of Moderate Length

Author

Listed:
  • Burden Conrad J.

    (Australian National University)

  • Jing Junmei

    (Australian National University)

  • Wilson Susan R.

    (Australian National University)

Abstract

The D2 statistic, defined as the number of matches of words of some pre-specified length k, is a computationally fast alignment-free measure of biological sequence similarity. However there is some debate about its suitability for this purpose as the variability in D2 may be dominated by the terms that reflect the noise in each of the single sequences only. We examine the extent of the problem and the effectiveness of overcoming it by using two mean-centred variants of this statistic, D2* and D2c. We conclude that all three statistics are potentially useful measures of sequence similarity, for which reasonably accurate p-values can be estimated under a null hypothesis of sequences composed of identically and independently distributed letters. We show that D2 and D2c, and to a somewhat lesser extent D2*, perform well in tests to classify moderate length query sequences as putative cis-regulatory modules.

Suggested Citation

  • Burden Conrad J. & Jing Junmei & Wilson Susan R., 2011. "Alignment-free Sequence Comparison for Biologically Realistic Sequences of Moderate Length," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:11:y:2011:i:1:n:3
    DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1724
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1544-6115.1724?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:11:y:2011:i:1:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.