IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/rlecon/v2y2006i3n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Desirability of Appellate Courts

Author

Listed:
  • Bar Niv Moshe

    (Interdisciplinary Center Herzlia and Bar-Ilan University)

  • Safra Zvi

    (The College of Management and Tel Aviv University)

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the necessity of an appeals process in private-civil litigation from the point of view of potential litigants. Our main concern is the question of whether the existence of an appeals system is to the benefit of potential litigants or if they would be better off in a system in which appeals are not possible. Our main observation is that it is unnecessary to enable appeals in all civil litigation. Indeed, a judicial system with a built-in appeals process is in many cases less desirable for the parties involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Bar Niv Moshe & Safra Zvi, 2006. "On the Desirability of Appellate Courts," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(3), pages 381-396, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:2:y:2006:i:3:n:4
    DOI: 10.2202/1555-5879.1089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1089
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1555-5879.1089?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:2:y:2006:i:3:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.