IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jqsprt/v7y2011i2n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

NFL Prediction using Committees of Artificial Neural Networks

Author

Listed:
  • David John A.

    (The College of Wooster)

  • Pasteur R. Drew

    (The College of Wooster)

  • Ahmad M. Saif

    (The College of Wooster)

  • Janning Michael C.

    (The College of Wooster)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the ability of a neural network model to predict the outcome of NFL games. This model uses only readily available statistics, such as passing yards, rushing yards, fumbles lost, and scoring. A key component of this model is the use of statistical differentials to compare teams. For example, the offensive passing yards gained by one team are compared to the defensive passing yards allowed by an opposing team to create a data set of expected values for a given matchup. By using principal component analysis and derivative based analysis, we determined which statistics influence our model the most. We assessed the performance of the model by comparing its performance to that of published prediction algorithms and the Las Vegas oddsmakers over multiple seasons. Two novel aspects of this work include the use of multiple committees of machines for prediction and the use of our model to simulate virtual round-robin tournaments to establish an objective ranking of the teams.

Suggested Citation

  • David John A. & Pasteur R. Drew & Ahmad M. Saif & Janning Michael C., 2011. "NFL Prediction using Committees of Artificial Neural Networks," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:7:y:2011:i:2:n:9
    DOI: 10.2202/1559-0410.1327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1327
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1559-0410.1327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David J. Hand & Heikki Mannila & Padhraic Smyth, 2001. "Principles of Data Mining," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 026208290x, December.
    2. Loeffelholz Bernard & Bednar Earl & Bauer Kenneth W, 2009. "Predicting NBA Games Using Neural Networks," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sumit Sarkar & Sooraj Kamath, 2023. "Does luck play a role in the determination of the rank positions in football leagues? A study of Europe’s ‘big five’," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 245-260, June.
    2. Manlio Migliorati & Marica Manisera & Paola Zuccolotto, 2023. "Integration of model-based recursive partitioning with bias reduction estimation: a case study assessing the impact of Oliver’s four factors on the probability of winning a basketball game," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 107(1), pages 271-293, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galli, L. & Galvan, G. & Levato, T. & Liti, C. & Piccialli, V. & Sciandrone, M., 2021. "Football: Discovering elapsing-time bias in the science of success," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Fernandez del Pozo, J. A. & Bielza, C. & Gomez, M., 2005. "A list-based compact representation for large decision tables management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(3), pages 638-662, February.
    3. Le, Hong Hanh & Viviani, Jean-Laurent, 2018. "Predicting bank failure: An improvement by implementing a machine-learning approach to classical financial ratios," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 16-25.
    4. Li, Hui & Sun, Jie, 2009. "Hybridizing principles of the Electre method with case-based reasoning for data mining: Electre-CBR-I and Electre-CBR-II," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 214-224, August.
    5. Xue, Puning & Zhou, Zhigang & Fang, Xiumu & Chen, Xin & Liu, Lin & Liu, Yaowen & Liu, Jing, 2017. "Fault detection and operation optimization in district heating substations based on data mining techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 926-940.
    6. Min-feng Lee & Guey-shya Chen & Shao-pin Lin & Wei-jie Wang, 2022. "A Data Mining Study on House Price in Central Regions of Taiwan Using Education Categorical Data, Environmental Indicators, and House Features Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Caruso, Germán & Scartascini, Carlos & Tommasi, Mariano, 2015. "Are we all playing the same game? The economic effects of constitutions depend on the degree of institutionalization," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 212-228.
    8. MARIA Dan Stefan, 2009. "Improving The Quality Of The Decision Making By Using Business Intelligence Solutions," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4(1), pages 996-1000, May.
    9. M. Almiñana & L. Escudero & A. Pérez-Martín & A. Rabasa & L. Santamaría, 2014. "A classification rule reduction algorithm based on significance domains," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 397-418, April.
    10. Silvia FIGINI & Ron S. KENETT & Silvia SALINI, 2010. "Integrating operational and financial risk assessments," Departmental Working Papers 2010-02, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    11. Tasadduq Imam, 2021. "Model selection for one‐day‐ahead AUD/USD, AUD/EUR forecasts," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1808-1824, April.
    12. Onur Doğan & Hakan Aşan & Ejder Ayç, 2015. "Use Of Data Mining Techniques In Advance Decision Making Processes In A Local Firm," European Journal of Business and Economics, Central Bohemia University, vol. 10(2), pages 6821:10-682, January.
    13. Doumpos, Michael & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2011. "Preference disaggregation and statistical learning for multicriteria decision support: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(3), pages 203-214, March.
    14. Nieminen, Paavo & Pölönen, Ilkka & Sipola, Tuomo, 2013. "Research literature clustering using diffusion maps," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 874-886.
    15. Patricia E. N. Lutu & Andries P. Engelbrecht, 2013. "Base Model Combination Algorithm for Resolving Tied Predictions for K -Nearest Neighbor OVA Ensemble Models," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 517-526, August.
    16. Pooyan Ramezani Besheli & Mehdi Zare & Ramezan Ramezani Umali & Gholamreza Nakhaeezadeh, 2015. "Zoning Iran based on earthquake precursor importance and introducing a main zone using a data-mining process," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(2), pages 821-835, September.
    17. Adrien Jamain & David Hand, 2008. "Mining Supervised Classification Performance Studies: A Meta-Analytic Investigation," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 25(1), pages 87-112, June.
    18. Fang, Jiali & Jacobsen, Ben & Qin, Yafeng, 2014. "Predictability of the simple technical trading rules: An out-of-sample test," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 30-45.
    19. Marcin Chlebus & Zuzanna Osika, 2020. "Comparison of tree-based models performance in prediction of marketing campaign results using Explainable Artificial Intelligence tools," Working Papers 2020-15, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    20. Silvia Figini & Roberto Savona & Marika Vezzoli, 2016. "Corporate Default Prediction Model Averaging: A Normative Linear Pooling Approach," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1-2), pages 6-20, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:7:y:2011:i:2:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.