IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jqsprt/v7y2011i2n16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pitcher Accuracy Through Catcher Spotting: Assessing Rater Reliability

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Andrew

    (Carnegie Mellon)

Abstract

Pitcher intent, as measured by the position of the catcher's glove before a pitch is thrown, is an element of baseball that is regularly observed by commentators ("he's missing his spots") but remains an uncaptured aspect of statistical analysis of the game, offering many potential aspects on pitcher performance that have yet to be exploited. In order to collect this data systematically for public consumption (a far from trivial task), I propose and design a number of mechanisms for manual collection of this data from video playback using an offine charting approach, the direct indication of catcher position on the video, or a combination of the two. Through a pilot study conducted via a web applet, I find that there are considerable advantages to the direct-on-video method of charting catcher spots, including a higher inter-rater reliability as a consequence of higher precision and fewer replays needed of each pitch for a measurement to be taken, suggesting that direct video analysis, rather than lower-tech zone assessment, will be the preferred method for collecting catcher spotting data as the method becomes more popular.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Andrew, 2011. "Pitcher Accuracy Through Catcher Spotting: Assessing Rater Reliability," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:7:y:2011:i:2:n:16
    DOI: 10.2202/1559-0410.1342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1559-0410.1342
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1559-0410.1342?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jqsprt:v:7:y:2011:i:2:n:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.