IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bistud/v8y2013i1p19-41n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Domestic Service and Gender Equality: An Unavoidable Problem for the Feminist Debate on Basic Income

Author

Listed:
  • Vollenweider Camila

    (Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Argentina)

Abstract

The debate on the desirability of a Basic Income (BI) for women has polarized between those who defend the measure as a way of reducing gender inequalities and those who believe that the policy could worsen the gender gap. This article argues for the former position, introducing the problem of domestic service, a paradigm of inequality not only between the genders but also among women. First, different dimensions of the “domestic service problem” are discussed in order to challenge the view that domestic service could be a “solution” for some gender inequalities. Second, it is argued that BI could significantly reduce outsourcing of reproductive work (at least in the private sphere) and could encourage women to demand equality in the home and a better public provision of care services. These effects of a BI could lead to a fairer overall system in terms of gender and class.

Suggested Citation

  • Vollenweider Camila, 2013. "Domestic Service and Gender Equality: An Unavoidable Problem for the Feminist Debate on Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 19-41, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:8:y:2013:i:1:p:19-41:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/bis-2012-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2012-0008
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/bis-2012-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bergmann Barbara R., 2008. "Basic Income Grants or the Welfare State: Which Better Promotes Gender Equality?," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-7, December.
    2. Gheaus Anca, 2008. "Basic Income, Gender Justice and the Costs of Gender-Symmetrical Lifestyles," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-8, December.
    3. repec:aia:aiaswp:wp17 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cameron, Anna & Tedds, Lindsay M., 2020. "Gender-Based Analysis Plus (GBA+) of Two Policy Alternatives: Basic Income and Basic Services," MPRA Paper 105939, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Robeyns Ingrid, 2008. "Introduction: Revisiting the Feminism and Basic Income Debate," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 3(3), pages 1-6, December.
    3. Uhde Zuzana, 2018. "Caring Revolutionary Transformation: Combined Effects of a Universal Basic Income and a Public Model of Care," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Judy FUDGE & Guy MUNDLAK, 2022. "Law and gendered labour market segmentation," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 161(4), pages 657-675, December.
    5. Cameron, Anna & Tedds, Lindsay M., 2021. "Gender-Based Violence, Economic Security, and the Potential of Basic Income: A Discussion Paper," MPRA Paper 107478, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. André Cieplinski & Simone D'Alessandro & Chandni Dwarkasing & Pietro Guarnieri, 2022. "Narrowing women’s time and income gaps: an assessment of the synergies between working time reduction and universal income schemes," Working Papers 250, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK, revised Apr 2022.
    7. Olli Kangas & Minna Ylikännö, 2023. "Basic Income and the Status of Women in an Established Gender-Equal Welfare State: Results from the Finnish Basic Income Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Ponczek, Vladimir & Grezzana, Stefânia, 2012. "Gender Bias at the Brazilian Superior Labor Court," Brazilian Review of Econometrics, Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria - SBE, vol. 32(1), March.
    9. Cieplinski, André & D'Alessandro, Simone & Dwarkasing, Chandni & Guarnieri, Pietro, 2023. "Narrowing women’s time and income gaps: An assessment of the synergies between working time reduction and universal income schemes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Prabhakar Rajiv, 2018. "Are Basic Capital Versus Basic Income Debates Too Narrow?," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-6, June.
    11. Jiaqi Yang & Geetha Mohan & Supriya Pipil & Kensuke Fukushi, 2021. "Review on basic income (BI): its theories and empirical cases," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 23(2), pages 203-239, December.
    12. Day, Creina, 2022. "Increasing inequality and voting for basic income: Could gender inequality worsen?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 476-487.
    13. Palermo Kuss Ana Helena & Neumärker K. J. Bernhard, 2018. "Modelling the Time Allocation Effects of Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Haagh Louise, 2015. "Alternative Social States and the Basic Income Debate: Institutions, Inequality and Human Development," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 45-81, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bistud:v:8:y:2013:i:1:p:19-41:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.