Frank D. Tinari (Tinari Economics Group) Kevin E. Cahill (Tinari Economics Group) Elias Grivoyannis (Yeshiva University)
Abstract
Under the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund (VCF), victims' families were provided monetary compensation based on economic and non-economic losses in exchange for giving up their right to sue U.S. entities, such as airlines. Was the Fund successful in calculating economic losses, and should it be repeated in the wake of another such attack? This paper assesses the extent to which forensic economists influenced the Special Master’s decisions. We find that, for the most part, the Special Master's economic awards before collateral offsets were bounded by the presumed award amounts and the forensic economist's calculations, with substantial variation across claimants. This result implies that the Special Master's economic awards appear to have been significantly influenced by other factors offered during the VCF hearings, raising questions about fairness if a similar process is to be repeated in the future.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Avi Warner).
Related research
Keywords:
Find related papers by JEL classification: H59 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Other K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description) K13 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Tort Law and Product Liability