IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/boh/actaub/v14y2011i1p135-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of brownfields - on example of the South Bohemian region

Author

Listed:
  • Zuzana Dvořáková Líšková

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

  • Eva Cudlínová

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

  • Petr Dvořák

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

  • Miloslav Lapka

    (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice)

Abstract

Regeneration of brownfields in developed countries is perceived as a complex process of changes of the entire society and landscape. It does not include only various social, economic and ecological aspects, but also the entire look and management of the area. Methods or tools for regeneration of landscape are used for territorially various areas, and thus it is necessary to judge this issue globally in all relations. The objective of this research was to apply the German model evaluation of brownfields for the conditions of South Bohemia, based on which we would be able to perform evaluation of brownfields from three frames of reference (from the point of view of a municipality, investor and public interest). Altogether, 32 brownfields were assessed. The study for localization of brownfields in South Bohemia from the year 2009 was the initial database for the performance of evaluation. The model applied in South Bohemia was based on 21 parameters. The interpretation of parameters was modified according to the local specifics, with respect to data availability. From the point of view of a municipality, the most preferred are brownfields (21) with a specific character, achieving 11-16 points. They are sufficiently large, suitable traffic and technical infrastructure. From the point of view of an investor, the most brownfields (23) achieved 12-23 points and they are well located, easy to reach, without regulations set by the area planning documentation and available workforce. The situation from the point of view of public interest is different. The most preferred are brownfields (22) with 1-5 points. Their regeneration does not cause big changes in the surroundings, does not significantly affect density of traffic, does not pollute environment and does not change local climate. The public interest examines the existence of ecological load.

Suggested Citation

  • Zuzana Dvořáková Líšková & Eva Cudlínová & Petr Dvořák & Miloslav Lapka, 2011. "Evaluation of brownfields - on example of the South Bohemian region," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, vol. 14(1), pages 135-142.
  • Handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:14:y:2011:i:1:p:135-142
    DOI: 10.32725/acta.2011.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.32725/acta.2011.015
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32725/acta.2011.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boh:actaub:v:14:y:2011:i:1:p:135-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tereza Šťástková (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efjcucz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.