IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stanee/v60y2006i3p361-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal versus orthogonal and equivalent‐estimation design of blocked and split‐plot experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Goos

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the recent literature on the design of blocked and split‐plot experiments with quantitative experimental variables. A detailed literature study introduces the ongoing debate between an optimal design approach to constructing blocked and split‐plot designs and approaches where the equivalence of ordinary least squares and generalized least squares estimates are envisaged. Examples where the competing design strategies lead to totally different designs are given, as well as examples in which the optimal experimental designs are orthogonally blocked or equivalent‐estimation split‐plot designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Goos, 2006. "Optimal versus orthogonal and equivalent‐estimation design of blocked and split‐plot experiments," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 60(3), pages 361-378, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:60:y:2006:i:3:p:361-378
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2006.00333.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2006.00333.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2006.00333.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goos, P. & Donev, A.N., 2006. "Blocking response surface designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 1075-1088, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Smucker, Byran J. & Castillo, Enrique del & Rosenberger, James L., 2012. "Model-robust designs for split-plot experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 4111-4121.
    2. Kalliopi Mylona & Harrison Macharia & Peter Goos, 2013. "Three-level equivalent-estimation split-plot designs based on subset and supplementary difference set designs," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(11), pages 1153-1165.
    3. Sambo, Francesco & Borrotti, Matteo & Mylona, Kalliopi, 2014. "A coordinate-exchange two-phase local search algorithm for the D- and I-optimal designs of split-plot experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1193-1207.
    4. JONES, Bradley & GOOS, Peter, 2012. "I-optimal versus D-optimal split-plot response surface designs," Working Papers 2012002, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    5. Xiaodong Li & Xu He & Yuanzhen He & Hui Zhang & Zhong Zhang & Dennis K. J. Lin, 2017. "The Design and Analysis for the Icing Wind Tunnel Experiment of a New Deicing Coating," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(520), pages 1417-1429, October.
    6. Palhazi Cuervo, Daniel & Goos, Peter & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2017. "An algorithmic framework for generating optimal two-stratum experimental designs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 224-249.
    7. Kessels, Roselinde & Goos, Peter & Vandebroek, Martina, 2008. "Optimal designs for conjoint experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2369-2387, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nha Vo-Thanh & Peter Goos & Eric D. Schoen, 2020. "Integer programming approaches to find row–column arrangements of two-level orthogonal experimental designs," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(7), pages 780-796, July.
    2. Belmiro P. M. Duarte, 2023. "Exact Optimal Designs of Experiments for Factorial Models via Mixed-Integer Semidefinite Programming," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    3. ARNOUTS, Heidi & GOOS, Peter, 2009. "Design and analysis of industrial strip-plot experiments," Working Papers 2009007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    4. Loeza-Serrano, S. & Donev, A.N., 2014. "Construction of experimental designs for estimating variance components," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1168-1177.
    5. Rodney N. Edmondson, 2020. "Multi-level Block Designs for Comparative Experiments," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 500-522, December.
    6. Georgiou, Stelios D. & Stylianou, Stella & Aggarwal, Manohar, 2014. "A class of composite designs for response surface methodology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1124-1133.
    7. Eugene C. Ukaegbu & Polycarp E. Chigbu, 2017. "Evaluation of Orthogonally Blocked Central Composite Designs with Partial Replications," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 79(1), pages 112-141, May.
    8. Peter Goos & Alexander Donev, 2007. "$$\mathcal{D}$$ -optimal Minimum Support Mixture Designs in Blocks," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 53-68, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stanee:v:60:y:2006:i:3:p:361-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0039-0402 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.