IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v85y2004i3p695-712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Christian Fundamentalists and Public Opinion Toward the Middle East: Israel's New Best Friends?

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy D. Mayer

Abstract

Objectives. Although Christian fundamentalist elites have become increasingly vocal in their support for Israel in the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, it is not clear that this rhetoric has produced differing attitudes about U.S. foreign policy in public opinion. This article examines whether such differences exist, and whether they are rooted in aspects of fundamentalist eschatology. Methods. Data from a national telephone survey on attitudes toward the Middle East conflict and U.S. policy were examined using multivariate regression and means comparisons. Results. These results demonstrate that Christian fundamentalists are the strongest supporters of Israel in America today. Fundamentalists have greater sympathy for Israel, oppose policies to pressure Israel, and are distinctive from all other groups in their high levels of support for continuing Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories, as well as complete Israeli control of Jerusalem. Conclusion. Christian fundamentalists in America are distinctive on this vital issue in American foreign policy because of their literal interpretation of the Bible or their leaders' increased cues on Middle East policies, or both. This suggests that religion is now an important factor in understanding public opinion on U.S. foreign policy in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy D. Mayer, 2004. "Christian Fundamentalists and Public Opinion Toward the Middle East: Israel's New Best Friends?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 85(3), pages 695-712, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:85:y:2004:i:3:p:695-712
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00240.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00240.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00240.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacob Dennen & Paul A. Djupe, 2023. "Are Christian nationalists antisemitic and why?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(3), pages 299-314, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:85:y:2004:i:3:p:695-712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.