IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/socsci/v82y2001i3p435-452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Black‐White Differentials in Adult Homicide Mortality in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Richard G. Rogers
  • Rebecca Rosenblatt
  • Robert A. Hummer
  • Patrick M. Krueger

Abstract

Objective. This article examines individual level black‐white differences in adult homicide mortality. Homicide is a major social problem and a central cause of preventable death in the United States. A homicide not only claims one life prematurely but can also devastate a family, friends, and a neighboring community. Methods. We link eight consecutive years of the National Health Interview Survey (1987–94) to the Multiple Cause of Death file through the National Death Index (1987–97), and use Cox proportional hazard models to examine the role of social factors in black‐white homicide mortality in the United States. Results. We find that individual level sociodemographic characteristics—age, sex, marital status, education, employment status, and geographic factors—explain almost 35 percent of the racial differences in homicide mortality. Conclusions. These results demonstrate the contributions that National Center for Health Statistics data can make to criminological literature and reveal the mechanisms through which blacks experience higher homicide mortality than whites. Such illumination may lead to a reduction in the fourth leading preventable cause of death in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard G. Rogers & Rebecca Rosenblatt & Robert A. Hummer & Patrick M. Krueger, 2001. "Black‐White Differentials in Adult Homicide Mortality in the United States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 82(3), pages 435-452, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:82:y:2001:i:3:p:435-452
    DOI: 10.1111/0038-4941.00034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/0038-4941.00034
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/0038-4941.00034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:socsci:v:82:y:2001:i:3:p:435-452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0038-4941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.