It is widely accepted that loans cause deposits. Hitherto, though, the empirical evidence has come from bivariate causality tests which we now know can give rise to invalid inference if either of the two variables is causally influenced by some third, omitted, variable. In this paper we have used tests developed by Toda and Yamamoto to investigate the possibility that earlier inferences were incorrect because of the omission of a third relevant variable, total transactions in this particular case. Including the third variable requires us to revise some of the earlier inferences reported here, Howells and Hussein (1998). The most striking result, however, is that while deposits appear to be caused by total transactions (which could have invalidated the fundamental inference that loans cause deposits) our tests show that even in the presence of a third variable, the core of the endogeneity thesis prevails. Loans do cause deposits. Copyright 2001 by Scottish Economic Society.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 48 (2001) Issue (Month): 5 (November) Pages: 547-57 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF