IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/sajeco/v86y2018i1p82-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemic Risks Spillovers and Interdependence among Stock Markets: International Evidence with Covar‐Copulas

Author

Listed:
  • Gideon Boako
  • Paul Alagidede

Abstract

Empirical studies have provided ample evidence on the potential benefits of international diversification with portfolios that consist of both domestic and foreign assets. This coupled with sudden and periodic crashes in global and developed equity markets have stimulated the interest of investors to diversify across markets that have the potential to provide decorrelation with global markets during turbulent periods. At the same time, international diversification may intensify cross‐border listing of stocks with its antecedent implication of shocks transmission. The above have engendered renewed interest among researchers to explore the dependence levels and spillover effects of shocks among emerging and developed equity markets. This paper examines tail dependence structure and (extreme) systemic risks spillover effects among international equity markets using advanced econometric techniques that underpin the modelling of asset returns. We find evidence of low positive significant dependencies between all African markets and their developed counterparts, except for Egypt. Although no evidence of spillover effects to the markets in Africa was found, both unidirectional and bi‐directional causality between some African and developed equity markets is found, albeit with differences. We are unable to ascribe the dynamics in the causality structure to level of market integration. It is inferred that the degree of individual local markets interdependence with developed counterparts may reflect the relative size, liquidity and degree of foreign investors' participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gideon Boako & Paul Alagidede, 2018. "Systemic Risks Spillovers and Interdependence among Stock Markets: International Evidence with Covar‐Copulas," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 86(1), pages 82-112, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:sajeco:v:86:y:2018:i:1:p:82-112
    DOI: 10.1111/saje.12182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12182
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/saje.12182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joel Hinaunye Eita & Charles Raoul Tchuinkam Djemo, 2022. "Quantifying Foreign Exchange Risk in the Selected Listed Sectors of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange: An SV-EVT Pairwise Copula Approach," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-29, April.
    2. Boakye, Robert Owusu & Mensah, Lord Kwaku & Kang, Sang Hoon & Osei, Kofi Acheampong, 2023. "Foreign exchange market return spillovers and connectedness among African countries," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Hong Shen & Qi Pan, 2022. "Risk Contagion between Commodity Markets and the Macro Economy during COVID-19: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Sun, Qingru & Gao, Xiangyun & An, Haizhong & Guo, Sui & Liu, Xueyong & Wang, Ze, 2021. "Which time-frequency domain dominates spillover in the Chinese energy stock market?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Boako, Gideon & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Ibrahim, Muazu & Ji, Qiang, 2019. "Analysing dynamic dependence between gold and stock returns: Evidence using stochastic and full-range tail dependence copula models," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:sajeco:v:86:y:2018:i:1:p:82-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.