IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v4y1984i1p60-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Policy As The Continuation Of Moral Philosophy By Other Means

Author

Listed:
  • William P. Branden

Abstract

The paper suggests that the oldest and newest glsubfieldslg of political science—political philosophy and public policy analysis–share important features lacking in those areas of the discipline that have modeled themselves after the natural sciences. Both are incompatible with the belief social sciences can be “value‐free” and both are legitimate academic pur‐ suits that aspire to systematic and rigorous analysis of significant questions or problems. Fundamental considerations link the two enterprises. (1) Public policy analysis as currently practiced i s based largely on economics which i s the instantiation of a particular moral philosophy. (2) Logical problems in the basic assumptions of applied economics and policy analysis require the kind of fundamental reexamination to which moral philosophy can contribute. The second section uses three health policy examples–tax expenditures that promote the purchase of health insurance, euthanasia, and long‐term institutional care for the elderly–to show how moral philosophy can help in policy analysis. The third section, an examination of Graham Allison's three epistemological models for understanding public policy, demonstrates that work in public policy also should stimulate philosophical inquiry.

Suggested Citation

  • William P. Branden, 1984. "Public Policy As The Continuation Of Moral Philosophy By Other Means," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 4(1), pages 60-70, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:4:y:1984:i:1:p:60-70
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00161.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00161.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00161.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongjin Choi & Ashley M. Fox, 2022. "Fact‐value framework for adjudicating public health policy debates," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(6), pages 820-844, November.
    2. Francine Sanders Romero, 2001. "The Policy Analysis Course: Toward a Discipline Consensus," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 771-779.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:4:y:1984:i:1:p:60-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.