IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v3y1984i3-4p383-390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding “Destarilization”: The United States Imperative

Author

Listed:
  • LOUIS RENE BERES

Abstract

The U.S. policy of trying to destabilize the Sandinista regime in Nicaragua violates accepted principles of international law. Based on the long‐standing principles of “humanitarian intervention” of the Nuremberg Judgment and Article 7 o f the U.N. General Assembly's 1974 Definition of Aggression and American traditional acceptance of the principles of natural law, the Nicaraguan intervention in El Salvador may be interpreted as law enforcement. The United States, on the other hand, is not acting on behalf of the international law of human rights in its llcovertll counter‐revolutionary operation in Nicaragua but i s acting to restore repression in Nicaragua. The trouble with U.S. policy in Central America is the Reagan administrationls simplified reliance on the East/West, “free versus nonfree” nations as the only meaningful axis of its foreign policy. This leads to acceptance of the might makes right doctrine and U.S. support for repressive regimes in such places as Guatemala and Haiti. These policies not only are unlawful and contrary toour best political traditions, but are verylikely to fail.

Suggested Citation

  • Louis Rene Beres, 1984. "Understanding “Destarilization”: The United States Imperative," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 3(3‐4), pages 383-390, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:3:y:1984:i:3-4:p:383-390
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00132.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00132.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1984.tb00132.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:3:y:1984:i:3-4:p:383-390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.