IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v26y2009i1-2p219-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conclusion: International Political Economy—The Reverse Salient of Innovation Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Zachary Taylor

Abstract

This conclusion attempts to answer three sets of questions regarding our experiment in cross‐field collaboration: What did we find and were these findings cohesive? What did our findings add to the debate? What are the implications of our findings, and, more importantly, what's next? It suggests that politics have become a “reverse salient” in innovation theory. Specifically, innovation scholars have yet to devise a theory that fully incorporates distributive politics and their security and competitiveness implications into a general explanation of technological change. This gap is holding back progress in fields that depend on innovation as an explanatory variable. It should therefore be made a priority for innovation scholars across the social sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Zachary Taylor, 2009. "Conclusion: International Political Economy—The Reverse Salient of Innovation Theory," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 26(1‐2), pages 219-223, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:26:y:2009:i:1-2:p:219-223
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00376.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00376.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00376.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:26:y:2009:i:1-2:p:219-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.