IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v26y2009i1-2p105-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shaping the Architecture of the U.S. Information and Communication Technology Architecture: A Political Economic Analysis1

Author

Listed:
  • Peter F. Cowhey
  • Jonathan D. Aronson
  • John Richards

Abstract

How did political economy help shape the revolution in telecommunications and computer networking? We offer three arguments concerning the impact of political economy and policy on the architecture of the U.S. information and communication technology infrastructure. First, it tilted toward an architectural principle of “modularity” that influenced the paths of both the telecom equipment, computer equipment and software, and computer networking markets. Second, it created multiple network infrastructures for telecommunications when other countries either tried to retain a monopoly infrastructure or limit the number of competitors. Third, it propelled a particular architecture for computing (intelligence at the edge of the network) and the full realization of the potential benefits of the Internet. The particular policy mix for competition matters, and this policy mix reflects fundamentals of political economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter F. Cowhey & Jonathan D. Aronson & John Richards, 2009. "Shaping the Architecture of the U.S. Information and Communication Technology Architecture: A Political Economic Analysis1," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 26(1‐2), pages 105-125, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:26:y:2009:i:1-2:p:105-125
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00371.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00371.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00371.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:26:y:2009:i:1-2:p:105-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.