IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v17y2000i1p1-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Health Care Reform: The Need For Comprehensive Micro‐Comparative Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Parsons
  • Gary M. Woller
  • Günther Neubauer
  • Frank T. Rothaermel
  • Barbara Zelle

Abstract

Microcomparison, or single‐component analysis, of health care systems offers a potentially better basis for reform than traditional macrocomparison analysis of aggregate elements. Using macroanalysis, available evidence shows that Germany provides cheaper but more effective hospital care than the United States. To find the causes for this outcome, we developed a microanalytic model of hospital administrators’ perceptions, financial ratios, medical outcomes, and pharmaceutical costs. However, only data on pharmaceutical costs were available and similar in both countries. Our significant outcome was development of a microcomparative model that gives world medical care providers new criteria for analyzing and improving cost to care rafios.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Parsons & Gary M. Woller & Günther Neubauer & Frank T. Rothaermel & Barbara Zelle, 2000. "International Health Care Reform: The Need For Comprehensive Micro‐Comparative Analysis," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 17(1), pages 1-31, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:17:y:2000:i:1:p:1-31
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2000.tb00906.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2000.tb00906.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2000.tb00906.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:17:y:2000:i:1:p:1-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.