This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Cohabitation and the Measurement of Child Poverty

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Carlson, Marcia
Danziger, Sheldon
Abstract

The authors use 1990 U.S. Census of Population data to calculate what poverty rates would have been if cohabitors were treated in the same manner as married couples. They find that the official treatment of cohabiting partners as separate family units overstated the extent of poverty in 1989 among all children by about 3 percent. Only about 11 percent of the observed rise in child poverty between 1969 and 1989 would be eliminated if the Census Bureau made this change in its definition of the family. The authors estimate a logistic regression model of the likelihood that poor, cohabiting families with children would be reclassified as non-poor if the cohabitor's income were included in family income. They find that many of these families would remain poor despite this change in measurement procedure because many cohabitors have low annual earnings or no earnings at all. Copyright 1999 by The International Association for Research in Income and Wealth.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Blackwell Publishing in its journal Review of Income & Wealth.

Volume (Year): 45 (1999)
Issue (Month): 2 (June)
Pages: 179-91
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:45:y:1999:i:2:p:179-91

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0034-6586

Order Information:
Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0034-6586

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Reagan Baughman & Stacy Dickert-Conlin & Scott Houser, 2000. "How Well Can We Track Cohabitation Using the SIPP? A Consideration of Direct and Inferred Measures," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 30, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University. [Downloadable!]
  2. Lindquist, Matthew J. & Sjögren Lindquist, Gabriella, 2008. "The Dynamics of Child Poverty in Sweden," Working Paper Series 4/2008, Swedish Institute for Social Research. [Downloadable!]
  3. Miguel Székely & Marianne Hilgert, 2000. "¿Qué hay detrás de las diferencias en la desigualdad entre los países?," RES Working Papers 4244, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department. [Downloadable!]
  4. Madalozzo, Regina, 2002. "An Analysis of Income Differentials by Marital Status," Ibmec Working Papers wpe_14, Ibmec Working Paper, Ibmec São Paulo. [Downloadable!]
  5. Miguel Székely & Marianne Hilgert, 2000. "What Drives Differences in Inequality Across Countries?," RES Working Papers 4243, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department. [Downloadable!]
  6. Thomas DeLeire & Ariel Kalil, 2002. "How Do Cohabiting Couples With Children Spend Their Money?," Working Papers 0204, Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Use the JEL tree to browse through the database by subfields.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-22.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.