IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revinw/v32y1986i4p387-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relating Households' Final Consumption To Household Activities: Substitutability Or Complementarity Between Market And Non‐Market Production

Author

Listed:
  • Ann Chadeau
  • Caroline Roy

Abstract

Household non‐market production is not observed directly and therefore not known. This paper develops a methodological approach to the description of household production functions based on the assumption that household non‐market production and household final consumption (as defined in National Accounts) are interdependent. What households produce and the way they produce depends to a large extent on what they may acquire on the market. Empirical data is provided both by the French National Accounts and Household Surveys. The study presents a nomenclature of household output by type of product derived from the nomenclature of household non‐market productive activities, to which final consumption products as described in the National Accounting nomenclatures are matched. Final consumption commodities are classified according to the role they play in household non‐market productive processes, and subdivided into three categories: “substitute products” which save households from producing similar commodities in the home; “complementary products” which are not produced by households, but serve to produce other goods and services; “pure final consumption products” which are neither produced by households nor serve in any further productive process before being actually consumed in the proper sense of the term. The combination of monetary and non‐monetary indicators provides information on household modes of production and on trends of output over the past 15 years. The method is implemented here for all households, in a global approach. It may, nonetheless, be adapted and serve to study disparities among households stemming from their characteristics, or to estimate the implicit price at which household members value the use of their time; it may also be used to assess the impact of market output on the nature of household non‐market production. National Accounts supply aggregate data on household final consumption, while time budget surveys constitute the main source of information on their activities. The method used in this study consists of matching the official nomenclatures used to structure the two sets of data, each designed to describe different aspects of one and the same economic unit. To be more precise, this study attempts to establish a correspondence between the nomenclature of activities and products (N.A.P.) [1] used in the French National Accounting System and the nomenclature of activities used in the French Time Budget Survey [2]. This matching procedure aims at showing up the substitutability or complementarity effects between household non‐market production and output of the market sector.1 The assumption of interdependence between households' final consumption (as defined in National Accounts) and their non‐market production leads to a classification of commodities acquired on the market into three categories: “substitute products”, which the household purchases rather than producing them itself; “complementary products”, which the household uses in order to produce other goods; and finally, “pure final consumption products”, which households do not produce (or no longer produce) and which they neither transform nor use in any further productive process.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann Chadeau & Caroline Roy, 1986. "Relating Households' Final Consumption To Household Activities: Substitutability Or Complementarity Between Market And Non‐Market Production," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 32(4), pages 387-407, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:32:y:1986:i:4:p:387-407
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1986.tb00547.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1986.tb00547.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1986.tb00547.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dobrescu, Emilian, 1996. "Macromodels of the Romanian transition Economy," MPRA Paper 35810, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Ours, J.C., 1989. "Self-service activities and legal or illegal market services," Serie Research Memoranda 0002, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    3. Ezequiel Uriel & Javier Ferri & Maria Luisa Molto, 2005. "Estimation of an Extended SAM with household production for Spain 1995," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 255-278.
    4. repec:ilo:ilowps:279583 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Goldschmidt-Clermont, Luisella., 1990. "Economic measurement of non-market household production : relating purposes and valuation methodologies," ILO Working Papers 992795833402676, International Labour Organization.
    6. Dobrescu, Emilian, 1998. "Macromodels of the Romanian transition economy, Second edition," MPRA Paper 35825, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revinw:v:32:y:1986:i:4:p:387-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iariwea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.