The paper uses Grossman and Helpman's "protection for sale" model (1994) to analyze the process of trade liberalization that has occurred in Australia. First, this paper verifies that the predictions of the "protection for sale" model are consistent with the data. Then, it analyzes the endogenous dimension of the Australian experience of trade liberalization. The estimated structural parameters imply that the process of trade liberalization has been driven by increases in both the fraction of the voting population represented by lobbies, and the government's relative valuation of welfare (the former playing the more prominent role). Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2004.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Rigoberto A. Lopez & Xenia Matschke, 2005.
"Food Protection for Sale,"
Working papers
2005-13, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2005.
[Downloadable!]
Wilfred J. Ethier, 2006.
"Selling Protection for Sale,"
PIER Working Paper Archive
06-014, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 01 Jun 2006.
[Downloadable!]