This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Do Population Control Policies Induce More Human Capital Investment? Twins, Birth Weight and China's "One-Child" Policy Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics MARK R. ROSENZWEIG
JUNSEN ZHANG
In this paper, we address the issues of whether reductions in fertility increase human capital investments per child and whether twinning can identify the quantity-quality (Q-Q) trade-off. We show that estimates of the effects of twinning at higher parities on the outcomes of older children in prior studies do not identify family-size effects but are confounded by inter-child allocation effects because of the endowment deficit and close spacing of twins. However, examining the effects of twinning by birth order, net of the effects stemming from the endowment deficit of twins, can provide upper and lower bounds on the trade-off between the family size and average child quality. Our estimates, based on data from China, indicate that an extra child at parity one or at parity two, net of one component of birth-endowment effects associated with birth weight, significantly decreases the schooling progress, the expected college enrolment, grades in school and the assessed health of all children in the family. Despite the evident significant trade-off between number of children and child quality in China, the findings suggest that the contribution of the one-child policy in China to the development of its human capital was modest. Copyright Copyright © 2009 The Review of Economic Studies Limited.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by Blackwell Publishing in its journal Review of Economic Studies .
Volume (Year): 76 (2009)
Issue (Month): 3 (07)
Pages: 1149-1174
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:bla:restud:v:76:y:2009:i:3:p:1149-1174Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0034-6527
Order Information: Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0034-6527
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords:
Access and
download statistics Did you know? Apart from a small start up grant in the 1990's, RePEc has received no funding and lives on the help of volunteers.
This page was last updated on 2009-12-19.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .