This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Coalition Formation in Non-Democracies Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics DARON ACEMOGLU
GEORGY EGOROV
KONSTANTIN SONIN
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
We study the formation of a ruling coalition in non-democratic societies where institutions do not enable political commitments. Each individual is endowed with a level of political power. The ruling coalition consists of a subset of the individuals in the society and decides the distribution of resources. A ruling coalition needs to contain enough powerful members to win against any alternative coalition that may challenge it, and it needs to be self-enforcing, in the sense that none of its subcoalitions should be able to secede and become the new ruling coalition. We present both an axiomatic approach that captures these notions and determines a (generically) unique ruling coalition and the analysis of a dynamic game of coalition formation that encompasses these ideas. We establish that the subgame-perfect equilibria of the coalition formation game coincide with the set of ruling coalitions resulting from the axiomatic approach. A key insight of our analysis is that a coalition is made self-enforcing by the failure of its winning subcoalitions to be self-enforcing. This is most simply illustrated by the following example: with "majority rule", two-person coalitions are generically not self-enforcing and consequently, three-person coalitions are self-enforcing (unless one player is disproportionately powerful). We also characterize the structure of ruling coalitions. For example, we determine the conditions under which ruling coalitions are robust to small changes in the distribution of power and when they are fragile. We also show that when the distribution of power across individuals is relatively equal and there is majoritarian voting, only certain sizes of coalitions ("e.g. "with majority rule, coalitions of size 1, 3, 7, 15, etc.) can be the ruling coalition. Copyright © 2008 The Review of Economic Studies Limited.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by Blackwell Publishing in its journal Review of Economic Studies .
Volume (Year): 75 (2008)
Issue (Month): 4 (October)
Pages: 987-1009
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:bla:restud:v:75:y:2008:i:4:p:987-1009Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0034-6527
Order Information: Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0034-6527
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords: Cited by : (explanations , Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Ghosal, Sayantan & Proto, Eugenio, 2008.
"Democracy, Collective Action and Intra-elite Conflict ,"
The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS)
844, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Sayantan Ghosal & Eugenio Proto, 2008.
"Democracy, Collective Action and Intra-Elite Conflict ,"
CEDI Discussion Paper Series
08-09, Centre for Economic Development and Institutions(CEDI), Brunel University.
[Downloadable!] Ghosal, Sayantan & Proto, Eugenio, 2009.
"Democracy, collective action and intra-elite conflict ,"
Journal of Public Economics ,
Elsevier, vol. 93(9-10), pages 1078-1089, October.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) Daron Acemoglu & Georgy Egorov & Konstantin Sonin, 2008.
"Dynamics and Stability of Constitutions, Coalitions, and Clubs ,"
NBER Working Papers
14239, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Access and
download statistics Did you know? A few items listed on IDEAS are over 2000 years old!
This page was last updated on 2009-11-22.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .