IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v50y2002i4p794-810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liberal Feminism: Individuality and Oppositions in Wollstonecraft and Mill

Author

Listed:
  • Gal Gerson

Abstract

The essay explores liberal feminism by matching Wollstonecraft's and J. S. Mill's works against radical feminist criticism. Though censured by radicals for perceiving society in binary terms modeled on the male‐female distinction, liberal feminists subscribe to a worldview that is variegated and dynamic. Liberal feminism does not oppose nature to culture or individuality to society, but rather sees the ability to achieve autonomous personhood as dependent on social conditions. This insight underpins liberal feminism's attitude to the status of women: to form as rational agents, humans have to be provided with social safeguards such as education and the vote. Far from being starkly individualistic, this agenda is based on liberal feminism's perception of individual rationality as a social product.

Suggested Citation

  • Gal Gerson, 2002. "Liberal Feminism: Individuality and Oppositions in Wollstonecraft and Mill," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 50(4), pages 794-810, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:50:y:2002:i:4:p:794-810
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9248.00008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elizabeth Frazer, 2008. "Mary Wollstonecraft on Politics and Friendship," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(1), pages 237-256, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:50:y:2002:i:4:p:794-810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.