IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v49y2001i5p974-997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review Article: International Distributive Justice

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Caney

Abstract

The literature on global justice contains a number of distinct approaches. This article identifies and reviews recent work in four commonly found in the literature. First there is an examination of the cosmopolitan contention that distributive principles apply globally. This is followed by three responses to the cosmopolitanism, – the nationalist emphasis on special duties to co‐nationals, the society of states claim that principles of global distributive justice violate the independence of states and the realist claim that global justice is utopian and that states should advance national interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Caney, 2001. "Review Article: International Distributive Justice," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 49(5), pages 974-997, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:49:y:2001:i:5:p:974-997
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00351
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9248.00351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tim Hayward, 2006. "Global Justice and the Distribution of Natural Resources," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(2), pages 349-369, June.
    2. Andrew Dobson, 2006. "Thick Cosmopolitanism," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(1), pages 165-184, March.
    3. Charlotta Friedner Parrat, 2010. "The Politics of Reporting: A Study of States' Strategies for Reporting to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 58(3), pages 472-496, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:49:y:2001:i:5:p:974-997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.