IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/polstu/v49y2001i2p249-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics and Foreign Policy: the Antinomies of New Labour's ‘Third Way’ in Sub‐Saharan Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Rita Abrahamsen
  • Paul Williams

Abstract

This article explores how New Labour has attempted to implement its ideas about a ‘third way’ foreign policy in sub‐Saharan Africa. Through an examination of British foreign policy practices, we explore whether New Labour has succeeded in finding a ‘third way’ between traditional views of socialism and capitalism in Africa. In particular, the article focuses on New Labour's attempts to build peace, prosperity and democracy on the African continent. We conclude that although New Labour's claims to add an ‘ethical dimension’ to foreign policy have succeeded in giving Britain a higher profile in the international arena, the implementation of such a policy is intrinsically difficult. These difficulties in turn arise from the antinomies embodied in New Labour's policy, or more specifically from the tension between the liberal internationalism of the third way and traditional concerns for the national interest, as well as the contradictions inherent in a commitment to both political and economic liberalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Rita Abrahamsen & Paul Williams, 2001. "Ethics and Foreign Policy: the Antinomies of New Labour's ‘Third Way’ in Sub‐Saharan Africa," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 49(2), pages 249-264, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:49:y:2001:i:2:p:249-264
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.00312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00312
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9248.00312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sam Hickey & Jeremy Seekings, 2017. "The global politics of social protection," WIDER Working Paper Series 115, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    2. Sam Hickey & Jeremy Seekings, 2017. "The global politics of social protection," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-115, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:polstu:v:49:y:2001:i:2:p:249-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0032-3217 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.