Kim, Belaire-Franch and Amador ["Journal of Econometrics" (2002) Vol. 109, pp. 389-392] and Busetti and Taylor ["Journal of Econometrics" (2004) Vol. 123, pp. 33-66] present different percentiles for the same mean score test statistic. We find that the difference by a factor 0.6 is due to systematically different sample analogues. Furthermore, we clarify which sample versions of the mean-exponential test statistic should be correctly used with which set of critical values. At the same time, we correct some of the limiting distributions found in the literature. Copyright (c) Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the Department of Economics, University of Oxford, 2008.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 70 (2008) Issue (Month): 5 (October) Pages: 705-710 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF