IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v59y2010i5p855-874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the weight of evidence by using quantitative short tandem repeat data in DNA mixtures

Author

Listed:
  • Torben Tvedebrink
  • Poul Svante Eriksen
  • Helle Smidt Mogensen
  • Niels Morling

Abstract

Summary. The evaluation of results from mixtures of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from two or more people in crime case investigations may be improved by taking not only the qualitative but also the quantitative part of the results into consideration. We present a statistical likelihood approach to assess the probability of observed peak heights and peak areas information for a pair of profiles matching the DNA mixture. Furthermore, we demonstrate how to incorporate this probability in the evaluation of the weight of the evidence by a likelihood ratio approach. Our model is based on a multivariate normal distribution of peak areas for assessing the weight of the evidence. On the basis of data from analyses of controlled experiments with mixed DNA samples, we exploited the linear relationship between peak heights and peak areas, and the linear relationships of the means and variances of the measurements. Furthermore, the contribution from one individual's allele to the mean area of this allele is assumed to be proportional to the average of peak height measurements of alleles, where the individual is the only contributor. For shared alleles in mixed DNA samples, it is possible to observe only the cumulative peak heights and areas. Complying with this latent structure, we used the EM algorithm to impute the missing variables on the basis of a compound symmetry model. The measurements were subject to intralocus and interlocus correlations not depending on the actual alleles of the DNA profiles. Owing to factorization of the likelihood, properties of the normal distribution and use of auxiliary variables, an ordinary implementation of the EM algorithm solved the missing data problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Torben Tvedebrink & Poul Svante Eriksen & Helle Smidt Mogensen & Niels Morling, 2010. "Evaluating the weight of evidence by using quantitative short tandem repeat data in DNA mixtures," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(5), pages 855-874, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:59:y:2010:i:5:p:855-874
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00722.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00722.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9876.2010.00722.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tvedebrink, Torben & Eriksen, Poul Svante & Morling, Niels, 2015. "The multivariate Dirichlet-multinomial distribution and its application in forensic genetics to adjust for subpopulation effects using the θ-correction," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 24-32.
    2. Tvedebrink, Torben, 2010. "Overdispersion in allelic counts and θ-correction in forensic genetics," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 200-210.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:59:y:2010:i:5:p:855-874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.