IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v170y2007i4p1001-1017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian model for ranking hazardous road sites

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Brijs
  • Dimitris Karlis
  • Filip Van den Bossche
  • Geert Wets

Abstract

Summary. Road safety has recently become a major concern in most modern societies. The identification of sites that are more dangerous than others (black spots) can help in better scheduling road safety policies. This paper proposes a methodology for ranking sites according to their level of hazard. The model is innovative in at least two respects. Firstly, it makes use of all relevant information per accident location, including the total number of accidents and the number of fatalities, as well as the number of slight and serious injuries. Secondly, the model includes the use of a cost function to rank the sites with respect to their total expected cost to society. Bayesian estimation for the model via a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach is proposed. Accident data from 519 intersections in Leuven (Belgium) are used to illustrate the methodology proposed. Furthermore, different cost functions are used to show the effect of the proposed method on the use of different costs per type of injury.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Brijs & Dimitris Karlis & Filip Van den Bossche & Geert Wets, 2007. "A Bayesian model for ranking hazardous road sites," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(4), pages 1001-1017, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:170:y:2007:i:4:p:1001-1017
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00486.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00486.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00486.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimitris Karlis, 2003. "An EM algorithm for multivariate Poisson distribution and related models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 63-77.
    2. Trevor C. Bailey & Paul J. Hewson, 2004. "Simultaneous modelling of multiple traffic safety performance indicators by using a multivariate generalized linear mixed model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(3), pages 501-517, August.
    3. Harvey Goldstein & David J. Spiegelhalter, 1996. "League Tables and Their Limitations: Statistical Issues in Comparisons of Institutional Performance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 159(3), pages 385-409, May.
    4. W. R. Gilks & P. Wild, 1992. "Adaptive Rejection Sampling for Gibbs Sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 41(2), pages 337-348, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ricardo A. Daziano & Luis Miranda-Moreno & Shahram Heydari, 2013. "Computational Bayesian Statistics in Transportation Modeling: From Road Safety Analysis to Discrete Choice," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 570-592, September.
    2. Nicholas C. Henderson & Michael A. Newton, 2016. "Making the cut: improved ranking and selection for large-scale inference," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(4), pages 781-804, September.
    3. Areti Boulieri & Silvia Liverani & Kees Hoogh & Marta Blangiardo, 2017. "A space–time multivariate Bayesian model to analyse road traffic accidents by severity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(1), pages 119-139, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Hewson & Keming Yu, 2008. "Quantile regression for binary performance indicators," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 401-418, September.
    2. Nils Gutacker & Andrew Street, 2015. "Multidimensional performance assessment using dominance criteria," Working Papers 115cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    3. Pang, W. K. & Yang, Z. H. & Hou, S. H. & Leung, P. K., 2002. "Non-uniform random variate generation by the vertical strip method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(3), pages 595-609, November.
    4. Bornmann, Lutz & Leydesdorff, Loet & Wang, Jian, 2014. "How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 175-180.
    5. Samantha Leorato & Maura Mezzetti, 2015. "Spatial Panel Data Model with error dependence: a Bayesian Separable Covariance Approach," CEIS Research Paper 338, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 09 Apr 2015.
    6. Arpino, Bruno & Varriale, Roberta, 2009. "Assessing the quality of institutions’ rankings obtained through multilevel linear regression models," MPRA Paper 19873, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Kalema, George & Molenberghs, Geert, 2016. "Generating Correlated and/or Overdispersed Count Data: A SAS Implementation," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(c01).
    8. Z. Rezaei Ghahroodi & M. Ganjali, 2013. "A Bayesian approach for analysing longitudinal nominal outcomes using random coefficients transitional generalized logit model: an application to the labour force survey data," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(7), pages 1425-1445, July.
    9. Mutz, Rüdiger & Daniel, Hans-Dieter, 2018. "The bibliometric quotient (BQ), or how to measure a researcher’s performance capacity: A Bayesian Poisson Rasch model," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1282-1295.
    10. Magne Mogstad & Joseph P. Romano & Azeem Shaikh & Daniel Wilhelm, 2020. "Inference for Ranks with Applications to Mobility across Neighborhoods and Academic Achievement across Countries," NBER Working Papers 26883, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Daraio, Cinzia & Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Simar, Léopold, 2015. "Rankings and university performance: A conditional multidimensional approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 918-930.
    12. Antonello Loddo & Shawn Ni & Dongchu Sun, 2011. "Selection of Multivariate Stochastic Volatility Models via Bayesian Stochastic Search," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 342-355, July.
    13. Chen, Ming-Hui & Ibrahim, Joseph G. & Sinha, Debajyoti, 2004. "A new joint model for longitudinal and survival data with a cure fraction," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 18-34, October.
    14. Nandram, Balgobin & Zelterman, Daniel, 2007. "Computational Bayesian inference for estimating the size of a finite population," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 2934-2945, March.
    15. Samaneh Mahabadi & Mojtaba Ganjali, 2015. "A Bayesian approach for sensitivity analysis of incomplete multivariate longitudinal data with potential nonrandom dropout," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 73(3), pages 397-417, December.
    16. Nicholas Longford & D. B. Rubin, 2006. "Performance assessment and league tables. Comparing like with like," Economics Working Papers 994, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    17. repec:lan:wpaper:991 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Fuentes-García, Ruth & Mena, Ramsés H. & Walker, Stephen G., 2009. "A nonparametric dependent process for Bayesian regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(8), pages 1112-1119, April.
    19. Brewer, M. J. & Aitken, C. G. G. & Talbot, M., 1996. "A comparison of hybrid strategies for Gibbs sampling in mixed graphical models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 343-365, March.
    20. Nils Gutacker & Andrew Street, 2018. "Multidimensional performance assessment of public sector organisations using dominance criteria," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 13-27, February.
    21. Kozumi, Hideo, 2004. "Posterior analysis of latent competing risk models by parallel tempering," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 441-458, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:170:y:2007:i:4:p:1001-1017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.