IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v36y1999i4p419-441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remember Re‐engineering? The Rhetorical Appeal of a Managerial Salvation Device

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Case

Abstract

This paper subjects a contemporary managerial doctrine, business process re‐engineering (BPR), to rhetorical scrutiny. Finding analytical inspiration from the writings of the American literary critic Kenneth Burke and adopting an anthropological attitude towards ‘history’, it seeks to demystify the appeal of BPR rhetoric as represented in various published and unpublished texts. The analysis makes extensive use of ‘sacred’ motifs in order to gain ‘perspective through incongruity’ and expose the secular motives at work in BPR literature. An analogy is drawn between ethnographic examples of ‘amnesia’ drawn from the author's study of a computer installation and ‘amnesia writ large’ through BPR. On the basis of this comparison, it is suggested that BPR can be read as offering cathartic absolution of the collective guilt associated with information technology mismanagement. Any ‘doubts’ that a managerial public may be harbouring are rhetorically harnessed by BPR protagonists in their attempts to acquire secular converts. The popularity of BPR may now be on the decline but there will be other similarly instrumental agendas to replace it in the future to which students of management need to be alert.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Case, 1999. "Remember Re‐engineering? The Rhetorical Appeal of a Managerial Salvation Device," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 419-441, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:36:y:1999:i:4:p:419-441
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00143
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6486.00143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:36:y:1999:i:4:p:419-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.