IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfnres/v34y2011i1p1-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences Of Opinion, Overconfidence, And The High‐Volume Premium

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaodan Huang
  • James B. Heian
  • Ting Zhang

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaodan Huang & James B. Heian & Ting Zhang, 2011. "Differences Of Opinion, Overconfidence, And The High‐Volume Premium," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 34(1), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:34:y:2011:i:1:p:1-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xingjian Zheng & Dehua Shen, 2020. "The High-Volume Return Premium: Does it Really Exist in the Chinese Stock Market?," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 27(2), pages 213-230, June.
    2. Wang, Peipei & Wen, Yuanji & Singh, Harminder, 2017. "The high-volume return premium: Does it exist in the Chinese stock market?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB), pages 323-336.
    3. Chae, Joon & Kang, Mhin, 2019. "Low-volume return premium in the Korean stock market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    4. Orhan ERDEM & Evren ARIK & Serkan YÜKSEL, 2014. "Trading Puzzle, Puzzling Trade," Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, Bilgesel Yayincilik, vol. 29(345), pages 83-102.
    5. Gordon, Narelle & Wu, Qiongbing, 2018. "The high-volume return premium and changes in investor recognition," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 121-136.
    6. Zhong, Angel & Chai, Daniel & Li, Bob & Chiah, Mardy, 2018. "Volume shocks and stock returns: An alternative test," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-16.
    7. Ma, Yao & Yang, Baochen & Su, Yunpeng, 2021. "Stock return predictability: Evidence from moving averages of trading volume," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Han, Yufeng & Hu, Ou & Huang, Zhaodan, 2023. "A tale of idiosyncratic volatility and illiquidity shocks: Their correlation and effects on stock returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jfnres:v:34:y:2011:i:1:p:1-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.