For homothetic time and state separable preferences, the coefficient of relative risk aversion is equal to the reciprocal of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution. This paper shows that, when the growth rate of consumption is independent and identically distributed, asset pricing models based upon preferences in which the coefficient of relative risk aversion and the elasticity of intertemporal substitution are no longer linked do not have more explanatory power. Further, in these stochastic environments, estimates of the coefficient of relative risk aversion in the standard preferences are measures of the true coefficient of relative risk aversion and not the elasticity of intertemporal substitutions. These results are fairly accurate descriptions of economies calibrated using United States annual data. Copyright 1990 by American Finance Association.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by American Finance Association in its journal Journal of Finance.
Volume (Year): 45 (1990) Issue (Month): 1 (March) Pages: 175-90 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML,
plain text,
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Martin Lettau & Sydney C. Ludvigson, 2005.
"Euler Equation Errors,"
NBER Working Papers
11606, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)