This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Evolutionary And New Growth Theories. Are They Converging? Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Fulvio Castellacci
This paper presents a critical review of evolutionary and new growth theories. The purpose is to discuss the often-made claim that the two approaches, both inspired by Schumpeter's seminal work, are becoming more and more similar in terms of the sources and mechanisms of the growth process on which they focus. According to this argument, some kind of theoretical convergence between the two paradigms is taking place. Differently from previous surveys of the field, this paper compares evolutionary and new growth theories by focusing on their major theoretical foundations. The discussion leads to the conclusion that the two approaches greatly differ with respect to all of their main theoretical building blocks, and that no convergence between the two paradigms is therefore taking place. This finding should be welcomed by both evolutionary and new growth scholars, because it is the process of interaction and the fruitful exchange of ideas between different approaches that lead to advances in growth theory, not their convergence to a common paradigm. Copyright 2007 The Author Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by Blackwell Publishing in its journal Journal of Economic Surveys .
Volume (Year): 21 (2007)
Issue (Month): 3 (07)
Pages: 585-627
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:bla:jecsur:v:21:y:2007:i:3:p:585-627Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0950-0804
Order Information: Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/subs.asp?ref=0950-0804
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Keywords:
Access and
download statistics Did you know? Cannot find something on IDEAS? Encourage the publisher to index it! Instructions .
This page was last updated on 2009-12-21.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .