IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jageco/v48y1997i1-3p349-378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calculating The Rate Of Decoupling For Crops Under Cap/Oilseeds Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Sean A. Cahill

Abstract

The model presented in this paper measures the rate of decoupling achieved by the compensatory payments package provided under ‘CAP/Oilseeds Reform’ legislation. Results from the model suggest that, contrary to expectations, we may view the compensatory payments as ‘effectively fully decoupled’ from production of wheat, rapeseed and soybeans. Three factors drive this result. First, when compared with base period returns, the compensatory payments ‘skew’ crop revenue per hectare. Second, the set–aside and ‘Blair House accord’ area restrictions on the model ensure effective full decoupling for rapeseed and soybeans. (Without these restrictions, the payments package is only partially decoupled from production of these crops.) Finally, as currently designed, the model does not allow land To leave crop production; thus, if area in one crop decreases in response to changes in prices and/or payments, area in at least one other crop must increase. For coarse grains and sunflower, the model generates decoupling rates of 80 per cent and 70 per cent respectively, suggesting partial decoupling of the payments package from production of these crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean A. Cahill, 1997. "Calculating The Rate Of Decoupling For Crops Under Cap/Oilseeds Reform," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1‐3), pages 349-378, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:48:y:1997:i:1-3:p:349-378
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1997.tb01159.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1997.tb01159.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1997.tb01159.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Guyomard & L. P. Mahé & C. Tavéra & T. Trochet, 1991. "Technical Change And Ec‐Us Agricultural Trade Liberalisation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 119-137, May.
    2. Hanoch, Giora, 1975. "Production and Demand Models with Direct or Indirect Implicit Additivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 43(3), pages 395-419, May.
    3. Roley R. Piggott, 1992. "Some Old Truths Revisited," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 36(2), pages 117-140, August.
    4. Barnett, William A. & Lee, Yul W. & Wolfe, Michael D., 1985. "The three-dimensional global properties of the minflex laurent, generalized leontief, and translog flexible functional forms," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1-2), pages 3-31.
    5. Y. Surry, 1993. "The Constant Difference Of Elasticities Function With Applications To The Ec Animal Feed Sector," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 110-125, January.
    6. Herve Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe, 1992. "Le projet Mac Sharry : facteurs de sensibilité du débouché céréalier communautaire," Post-Print hal-01600180, HAL.
    7. Westhoff, Patrick & Hayes, Dermot J. & Meyers, William H. & Buhr, Brian L. & Eswaramoorthy, K. & Hansen, James & Helmar, Michael D. & Hennessy, David A. & Stephens, Deborah L. & Johnson, Stanley R. & , 1991. "Analysis of the Ec Commission Plan for Cap Reform," Staff General Research Papers Archive 417, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Patrick C. Westhoff, 1991. "Analysis of the EC Commission Plan for CAP Reform, An," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 92-gatt4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    9. Thomas W. Hertel, 1989. "Negotiating Reductions in Agricultural Support: Implications of Technology and Factor Mobility," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(3), pages 559-573.
    10. Gordon Gemmill, 1978. "Estimating and forecasting agricultural supply from times-series: A comparison of direct and indirect methods," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 5(2), pages 175-191.
    11. Piggott, Roley R., 1992. "Some Old Truths Revisited," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 147251, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Piggott, Roley R., 1992. "Some Old Truths Revisited," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 36(2), pages 1-24, August.
    13. W.A. Barnett & J.M. Binner, 2004. "The Global Properties of the Minflex Laurent, Generalized Leontief, and Translog Flexible Functional Forms," Contributions to Economic Analysis, in: Functional Structure and Approximation in Econometrics, pages 79-97, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    14. Patrick C. Westhoff, 1991. "Analysis of the EC Commission Plan for CAP Reform, An," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 92-gatt4, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    15. Cahill, Sean A., 1993. "Cap Reform: How Decoupled are the Compensatory Payments?," Working Papers 244085, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    16. Hervé Guyomard & Louis-Pascal Mahe, 1992. "Le projet Mac Sharry : facteurs de sensibilité du débouché céréalier communautaire," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 211(1), pages 20-29.
    17. Yves Surry, 1993. "The constant difference of elasticities function with applications to the EC animal feed sector," Post-Print hal-01600456, HAL.
    18. Cahill, S.A., 1993. "Cap Reform: How Decoupled are the Compensatory Payments," Papers 11-93, Gouvernement du Canada - Agriculture Canada.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cai, Yiyong & Newth, David & Finnigan, John & Gunasekera, Don, 2015. "A hybrid energy-economy model for global integrated assessment of climate change, carbon mitigation and energy transformation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 381-395.
    2. Noel Perceval Assogba & Daowei Zhang, 2020. "An Economic Analysis of Tropical Forest Resource Conservation in a Protected Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Hess, Sebastian & Surry, Yves R., 2011. "The CDET Profit Function: Could it generate a Parsimonious Agricultural Sector Model?," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114539, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Lavoie, Nathalie, 2002. "Price Discrimination in the Context of Vertical Differentiation: An Application to Canadian Wheat Exports," Research Reports 25210, University of Connecticut, Food Marketing Policy Center.
    5. Seyoum, Emayenesh & Goddard, Ellen & MacLaren, Donald & Griffith, Garry, 2002. "Modelling World Dairy Trade: The Potential Impact of Officially Supported Export Credits on the Australian Dairy Industry," 2002 Conference (46th), February 13-15, 2002, Canberra, Australia 183422, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Rickard, Bradley J. & Gonsalves, Jana L., 2008. "How would compliance with dietary recommendations affect revenues for agricultural producers?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 422-433, October.
    7. Benjamin Henderson & Lynn Henry & Gordon MacAulay & Jen Tatuh, 2010. "Potential Payoff from R&D in the Coconut Industry of North Sulawesi, Indonesia," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 24(1), pages 69-85, March.
    8. Preckel, Paul V. & Cranfield, John A.L. & Hertel, Thomas W., 2005. "Implicit Additive Preferences: A Generalization Of The Ces," Staff Papers 28646, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    9. James, Jennifer S., 1999. "Endogenous Quality And Agricultural Policy Analysis," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21634, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Ambarawati, I Gusti Agung Ayu & Zhao, Xueyan & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R., 2003. "Distribution of Gains from Cattle Development in a Multi-Stage Production System: The Case of the Bali Beef Industry," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57829, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    11. Touhami Abdelkhalek & Dorothée Boccanfuso, 2021. "Impact of Tax Reforms in Applied Models: Which Functional Forms Should Be Chosen for the Demand System? Theory and Application for Morocco," CIRANO Working Papers 2021s-07, CIRANO.
    12. Rickard, Brad & Gergaud, Olivier & Hu, Wenjing, 2014. "Trade liberalization in the presence of domestic regulations: Impacts of the proposed EU-U.S. free trade agreement on wine markets," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170462, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Ying Lin & Henry W. Kinnucan, 2020. "The optimal export tax for a primary commodity in a vertical market," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(6), pages 909-922, November.
    14. Ambarawati, I Gusti Agung Ayu & Zhao, Xueyan & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R., 2004. "The Cost to the Bali Beef Industry of the October 2002 Terrorist Attack," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 12.
    15. X. Zhao & J.D. Mullen & G.R. Griffith & R.R. Piggott & W.E. Griffiths, 2002. "The Economic Incidence of R&D and Promotion Investments in the Australian Beef Industry," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 16/02, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    16. Huang, Hsin & van Tongeren, Frank & Dewbre, Joe Dewbre, Joe & van Meijl, Hans, 2004. "A New Representation of Agricultural Production Technology in GTAP," Conference papers 330233, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Hervé Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe, 1993. "La réforme de la PAC (texte de mai 1992) évaluation à l'aide du modèle MISS," Working Papers hal-01594128, HAL.
    18. Yang, Anton C., 2020. "Structural Estimation of a Gravity Model of Trade with the Constant-Difference-of-Elasticities Preferences," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304636, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Lavoie, Nathalie, 2002. "An Empirical Evaluation Of The Canadian Wheat Board'S Ability To Price Discriminate In Bread Wheat Exports," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19646, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Zhao, Xueyan & Mullen, John D. & Griffith, Garry R. & Griffiths, William E. & Piggott, Roley R., 2000. "An Equilibrium Displacement Model of the Australian Beef Industry," Research Reports 28007, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jageco:v:48:y:1997:i:1-3:p:349-378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-857X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.