IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v28y2004i3p570-585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conjuncture or disjuncture? An institutionalist analysis of local regeneration partnerships in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan S. Davies

Abstract

Following Vivien Lowndes' injunction for scholars to take the new institutionalism seriously, this article offers an institutionalist explanation for the development of regeneration partnerships in the UK. Drawing on four complete case studies and evidence from ongoing research into New Deal for Communities, it argues that UK‐style partnerships tend to embody conflicting values and hierarchical patterns of organization. This is therefore a path‐shaping period, since partnerships have not established themselves as coordinating mechanisms built on strong‐weak ties. Vivien Lowndes ayant enjoint les intellectuels à prendre au sérieux le nouvel institutionnalisme, cet article propose une explication institutionnaliste à l'essor des partenariats de régénération au Royaume‐Uni. A partir de quatre études de cas terminées et d'indices issus de recherches en cours sur la ‘Nouvelle Donne pour les Communautés’, il affirme que les partenariats de type britannique tendent à exprimer des valeurs opposées et des modes hiérarchiques d'organisation. Il se dégage donc une phase d'orientation de trajectoire, les partenariats ne s'étant pas créés comme des mécanismes coordinateurs reposant sur des liens forts‐faibles.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan S. Davies, 2004. "Conjuncture or disjuncture? An institutionalist analysis of local regeneration partnerships in the UK," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 570-585, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:28:y:2004:i:3:p:570-585
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00536.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00536.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00536.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jesse Heley & Kate Moles, 2012. "Partnership working in regions: Reflections on local government collaboration in Wales," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 4(2), pages 139-153, June.
    2. Alberta Andreotti & Enzo Mingione & Emanuele Polizzi, 2012. "Local Welfare Systems: A Challenge for Social Cohesion," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1925-1940, July.
    3. Ariel Mendez & Delphine Mercier, 2007. "Territorial Dynamics and History Imprint : Two french Clusters in Transition in the South East Region," Working Papers halshs-00360764, HAL.
    4. Gillian Bristow & Tom Entwistle & Frances Hines & Steve Martin, 2008. "New Spaces for Inclusion? Lessons from the ‘Three‐Thirds’ Partnerships in Wales," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 903-921, December.
    5. Lesley Hemphill & Stanley McGreal & Jim Berry & Siobhan Watson, 2006. "Leadership, Power and Multisector Urban Regeneration Partnerships," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(1), pages 59-80, January.
    6. Brita Hermelin & Hans Rämö, 2017. "Intermediary activities and agendas of regional cleantech networks in Sweden," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 130-146, February.
    7. Isabel Breda-Vázquez & Paulo Conceição & Ruben Fernandes, 2009. "Partnership Diversity and Governance Culture: Evidence from Urban Regeneration Policies in Portugal," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(10), pages 2213-2238, September.
    8. Lang, Thilo, 2005. "Insights in the British Debate about Urban Decline and Urban Regeneration," IRS Working Papers 32, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    9. Phil Jones & James Evans, 2006. "Urban Regeneration, Governance and the State: Exploring Notions of Distance and Proximity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(9), pages 1491-1509, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:28:y:2004:i:3:p:570-585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.