IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijethy/v14y2018i4p323-349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The second‐tier trap: Theory and experimental evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Duk Gyoo Kim

Abstract

Winner‐take‐all competitions can lead to the person in the second‐tier (middle‐tier) environment having the worst expected payoff when players exclusively choose their environment and exert effort before their random, heterogeneous environmental supports are realized. The tiers are defined by the ranks in pairwise competitions. The second‐tier trap (STT) is a situation in which a player from the second‐tier environment has the worst expected payoff even though his expected environmental support is strictly greater than that of the third‐tier player. A sufficient condition for the STT is that the ex‐ante advantages, the winning probabilities when all the players exert the same amount of effort regardless of their environment, are the same for those two environments. I claim that this sufficient condition for the STT is so weak that players can easily be tempted to choose the second‐tier environment, which is the wrong decision. Lab experiments strongly support this claim.

Suggested Citation

  • Duk Gyoo Kim, 2018. "The second‐tier trap: Theory and experimental evidence," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 14(4), pages 323-349, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijethy:v:14:y:2018:i:4:p:323-349
    DOI: 10.1111/ijet.12158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijet.12158
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ijet.12158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijethy:v:14:y:2018:i:4:p:323-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1742-7355 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.