AbstractMy experience as an evaluator for the Farm Investment Support Measure of the Rural Development Programme (RDP) in Germany is that evaluation may not have the power to bring about 'policies that perform better'. Its recommendations are often ignored by national as well as the European administration, either because evaluations are low in scientific quality or because managing authorities are accustomed to adapting measures mainly for fiscal or political reasons. The Commission's approach to improving evaluation quality has been focused on advancing the indicators of the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework and on building capacity. Although these measures can contribute to an upgrading of RDP evaluation they will neither be sufficient to achieve satisfactory quality nor substantially increase the use of evaluation in policymaking. These effects could potentially be achieved through quality control and enforcement, and an obligation for policy to react to evaluation results. The Commission is already using a standardised quality control grid in the evaluations of the CAP's first pillar and should apply this instrument to RDP evaluations. Additionally, the consideration of evaluation recommendations in policymaking should be encouraged through the introduction of a 'fiche contradictoire'. This is the formal and explicit mechanism used in EU development policy for follow-up on the use of evaluations. Copyright (c) 2009 The Author. Journal compilation (c) The Agricultural Ecomomics Society and the European Association of Agricultural Economists 2009.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by The Agricultural Economics Society in its journal EuroChoices.
Volume (Year): 8 (2009)
Issue (Month): 3 (December)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1478-0917
More information through EDIRC
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.